2021
DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-3235-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of absorbing aerosols above clouds over the south-east Atlantic Ocean from the geostationary satellite SEVIRI – Part 2: Comparison with MODIS and aircraft measurements from the CLARIFY-2017 field campaign

Abstract: Abstract. To evaluate the SEVIRI retrieval for aerosols above clouds presented in Part 1 of the companion paper, the algorithm is applied over the south-east Atlantic Ocean during the CLARIFY-2017 field campaign period. The first step of our analysis compares the retrieved aerosol and cloud properties against equivalent products from the MODIS MOD06ACAERO retrieval (Meyer et al., 2015). While the correlation between the two satellite retrievals of the above-cloud aerosol optical thickness (AOT) is good (R = 0.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The retrieved cloud properties are only weakly sensitive to assumptions on the properties of the absorbing aerosol, with biases lower than 6% in τ and 3% in r eff . The retrieved cloud properties match well MODIS retrievals and in‐situ measurements from the CLARIFY field campaign (Peers et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Methods and Datasupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The retrieved cloud properties are only weakly sensitive to assumptions on the properties of the absorbing aerosol, with biases lower than 6% in τ and 3% in r eff . The retrieved cloud properties match well MODIS retrievals and in‐situ measurements from the CLARIFY field campaign (Peers et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Methods and Datasupporting
confidence: 68%
“…( 2019 ) algorithm accounts for absorbing aerosols located above clouds. The presence of absorbing aerosol above clouds has a small effect on retrieved cloud drop effective radius r eff , but cloud optical depth τ is underestimated by 35% when ignoring above‐cloud aerosol (Peers et al., 2021 ). The retrieved cloud properties are only weakly sensitive to assumptions on the properties of the absorbing aerosol, with biases lower than 6% in τ and 3% in r eff .…”
Section: Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Comparisons to aircraft-derived above-cloud aerosol optical depths reveal a genuinely high bias to the satellite ACAOD estimates which is thought to reflect too high a single-scattering albedo assumption within the retrieval (Peers et al, 2021).…”
Section: Data Sets and Compositing Approachmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Other examples are documented in Diamond et al (2018), Abel et al (2020). Pennypacker et al (2020) also document that ultra-clean days at Ascension are most common during September, although they only partially attribute these to a Southern Ocean origin.…”
Section: July: Smoke Reduces Cloud Fractionmentioning
confidence: 99%