1981
DOI: 10.2151/jmsj1965.59.6_864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Clear-Air Echoes with 3.2-cm Radars

Abstract: Clear-air echoes were observed in Nagoya with two radars of 3.2 cm in wavelength. Most of echoes were dot echoes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result of the analysis of the AMeDAS precipitation data (Figures not shown), it turned out that no precipitation was observed near the echoes around 1500 JST on the days. Therefore, it is possible that the echoes near the northeast of Nagoya are clear air echoes (Takeda and Murabayashi 1981;Kusunoki 2002), and then the present study can not judge whether the echoes represent precipitation and the clouds northeast of Nagoya can bring precipitation. However, Seko and Takeda (1987) observed quasi-steady radar echoes of an isolated organized cumulonimbus and a local heavy rainfall at the northeast of Nagoya (Kasugai City), in the afternoon on a summer day with no distinct fronts and strong disturbances around Japan.…”
Section: Cloud Distributionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…As a result of the analysis of the AMeDAS precipitation data (Figures not shown), it turned out that no precipitation was observed near the echoes around 1500 JST on the days. Therefore, it is possible that the echoes near the northeast of Nagoya are clear air echoes (Takeda and Murabayashi 1981;Kusunoki 2002), and then the present study can not judge whether the echoes represent precipitation and the clouds northeast of Nagoya can bring precipitation. However, Seko and Takeda (1987) observed quasi-steady radar echoes of an isolated organized cumulonimbus and a local heavy rainfall at the northeast of Nagoya (Kasugai City), in the afternoon on a summer day with no distinct fronts and strong disturbances around Japan.…”
Section: Cloud Distributionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Values of of insect echoes observed by Ka-band radars can be up to 0 dBZ (Luke et al 2008;Browning et al 2011), i.e., larger than observed in the present study (<−10 dBZ). It is considered that the difference in maximum reflects the difference in the backscattering cross section depending on the observed insect (Takeda and Murabayashi 1981;Martin and Shapiro 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knight and Miller (1993) examined the early stage of precipitation formation in clouds and highlighted that Bragg scattering can affect the equivalent radar reflectivity ( ) at magnitudes of <10, 0, and −10 dBZ for S-(10-cm), C-(5-cm), and X-band (3-cm) radars, respectively. Biological echoes have been observed associated with birds (Harper 1958;Russell et al 1998;Diehl et al 2003;Minda et al 2008; Van Den Broeke 2013), bats (Horn and Kunz 2008;Pennisi 2011;Rauber and Nesbitt 2018;Meade et al 2019), and insects (Glover et al 1966;Riley 1975;Takeda and Murabayashi 1981;Kusunoki 2002). Birds and bats show characteristic circular echoes when leaving their roost (Pennisi 2011; Van Den Broeke 2013; Rauber and Nesbitt 2018), whereas a flock of migrating birds typically shows as an irregular line in a radar echo when in V-shaped flight formation (Minda et al 2008;Rauber and Nesbitt 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To a certain a range bin' values for Sd(Z), Sd(Z DR ), Sd(ρ HV ) and Sd(Φ DP ), it is easy to acquire the probability of p(Sd(Z)|CAT), p(Sd(Z DR )|CAT), p(Sd(ρ HV )|CAT) and p(Sd(Φ DP )|CAT) by using PDDs of CAT, p(CAT|y) can be acquired by Equation (5). The probability of p(Sd(Z)|ME), p(Sd(Z DR )| ME), p(Sd(ρ HV )|ME) and p(Sd(Φ DP )|ME) can be acquired by using PDDs of ME, then p(ME|y) can be obtained by Equation (6). if p(CAT|y) > p(ME|y), the echo of this range bin will be distinguished as CAT, otherwise, is ME.…”
Section: Methodology 221 Bayesian Approach For the Identification Of Catsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clear air turbulence echoes (hereafter CATs) can be observed by X-band radar [4][5][6]. The CATs of five X-POLs are source of contaminations for radar precipitation estimations, it is need to remove CATs and only retain the precipitation echoes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%