“…In an AFM with two equivalent sublattice magnetizations denoted by M A and M B oriented antiparallel, | M A | = | M B | = M 0 is the magnitude of the sublattice magnetization; the normalized AFM Néel vector (order parameter) is given by l = ( M A – M B )/(2 M 0 ) . Electrical manipulation of the AFM Néel vector with the prospect of encoding information was achieved in various AFM compounds, such as CuMnAs, Mn 2 Au, Mn 3 Pt, , Mn 3 Sn, IrMn 3 , NiO, and CoO, via a relativistic mechanism, namely, Néel order spin–orbit torque (SOT)likely without invoking heat or magnetic fields. In strong contrast, recent experiments showed that significant amounts of charge current densities (≥4 × 10 7 A/cm 2 ) beyond the linear ohmic regime of the devices are needed to switch the Néel vector (or the local AFM domains). − The power efficiency, the physical mechanism of switching, and the efficiency of the electrical detection method for validating the current-induced microscopic switching of the AFM domains are currently under investigation. − Moreover, recent work based on NiO/Pt bilayer devices revealed a current-induced purely thermomagnetoelastic switching mechanism …”