2001
DOI: 10.1021/ja0158152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Hole Transfer through DNA by Monitoring the Transient Absorption of Pyrene Radical Cation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
81
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gel electrophoretic analysis clearly demonstrated that the hole can migrate over 100 Å, whereas time-resolved transient absorption measurement was limited to the kinetics of the single-step (26) or short-distance (29,30) hole transfer. To our knowledge, there is no reliable report for the kinetics of the multistep long-distance hole transfer because of the difficulty of efficiently generating a hole in DNA, and therefore, the kinetics of the long-distance hole transfer still remains unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gel electrophoretic analysis clearly demonstrated that the hole can migrate over 100 Å, whereas time-resolved transient absorption measurement was limited to the kinetics of the single-step (26) or short-distance (29,30) hole transfer. To our knowledge, there is no reliable report for the kinetics of the multistep long-distance hole transfer because of the difficulty of efficiently generating a hole in DNA, and therefore, the kinetics of the long-distance hole transfer still remains unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear correlation between ln k cr and ∆r was obtained to provide the β-value of 0.4 Å -1 which is a little smaller than that for the duplex DNA (Fig. 4) [11][12][13]25]. This might be attributed to the difference in the tunneling energy between the donor or acceptor and bridge states [26,27], or to the structure of the hairpin ODN containing the consecutive A sequence.…”
Section: K Kawai and T Majimamentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The efficiency of the photoinduced one-electron oxidation of DNA is seemingly low since the charge recombination rate is usually much faster than the process leading to the DNA strand cleavage, such as the reaction of G ؒ+ with water [10,13,30]. Hole transfer by G-hopping is also too slow to compete with charge recombination.…”
Section: Lifetime Of Charge-separated State and Photosensitized Dna Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the efficiency of producing photosensitized DNA damage is low because the charge recombination rate is usually much faster than the process leading to DNA damage, such as the reaction of GC + with water. [5][6][7][8] Thus, the absorption of a photon by Sens occasionally leads to DNA damage, but only with the aid of hole transfer, which provides time for DNAC + and SensC À to react with water or O 2 . [9][10][11][12][13][14] Herein, we report the first study of nanosecond-laser DNA damaging in which a combination of two-color pulses is used as a promising new strategy to reach a high DNA-damaging efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%