Observation of magnetic monopoles in the field of a line conductor with a current

Mikhailov, V.F.

doi:10.1088/0305-4470/18/14/014

Cited by 13 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The series of magnetic charges we deduce is consistent with experiments of Ehrenhaft (1930Ehrenhaft ( , 1944, Schedling (1950), Ferber (1950) and Mikhaïlov (1982Mikhaïlov ( , 1985Mikhaïlov ( , 1987 using illuminated ferromagnetic aerosols. This is an important point because as far as we know no theoretical prediction compatible with those charges is found in the literature.…”

Section: Magnetic Charge Detectionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Quantized Charges and Currents in the Electromagnetic Field

Consiglio¹

2013

APR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We consider the demonstration of Dirac charge quantization and interpret the main equation as the signature of a current of magnetic poles building the electron wave and mass. This naturally leads to opposite coefficients in Dirac’s equation, and to series of small quanta of magnetic charge g = a e/2n including one in exact agreement with Mikhaïlov experimental estimate g = a e/6. The resulting theoretical monopole wave is a quantized current of electricity that cancels or replaces the Dirac string. Energy is the effect of the magnetic current interacting with an electric charge, and the theory trivially agrees with the energy gap of hydrogen orbitals E = E₀/n². A second series of charges g = n a e comes out of the equations, which it is shown compatible with the electrons, muons and tauons mass built from a finite suite of magnetic poles. Once opposite coefficients are taken into account, the symmetry of magnetism and electricity discovered by Dirac matches with experimental charges and involves charges and currents.

show abstract

Section: Magnetic Charge Detectionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Quantized Charges and Currents in the Electromagnetic Field

Consiglio¹

2013

APR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Let us first recall that direct measurements of Ehrenhaft (1930Ehrenhaft ( , 1944, Schedling (1950), Ferber (1950) lead to an estimate of the magnetic charge g = α e; Mikhaïlov (1982Mikhaïlov ( , 1985Mikhaïlov ( , 1987Mikhaïlov ( , 1991 obtained similar results, but using modern data analysis tools and from a large number of samples he gave an empirical estimate of the magnetic charge quantum g = α e/6. Both estimates are consistent with our quantization.…”

Section: Magnetic Charges Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Minkowski Space and Tachyon Velocity

Consiglio¹

2013

APR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A brief analysis of classical tachyons in Minkowski space shows that de Broglie wave phase velocity V = c²/v does not enable causality violations and gives an inversion of energy/momentum ratio between bradyons and tachyons. It leads to considering Vv = c² as a symmetry of Minkowski space where, for V > c, the signature of space-time is seen inverted. The inversion is shown coherent with Cramer’s transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics, but implies the physical existence of the past and the inexistence of the future.

In a recent paper we assume that the electron wave is a magnetic current at the origin of its mass; it leads to reversed coefficients with respect to the Dirac condition. Using space-time signature inversion we show that the monopole has, in linked electrons states, quantized velocities in agreement with the de Broglie wave phase velocity. The magnetic charge is relativistic and quantum in origin and comes from the Lorentz transformation of a quantum of current. We also show that gravitation is a natural consequence of the theory.

The predicted charges agree with experimental results from Ehrenhaft, Schedling, Ferber and Mikhaïlov. They also agree, in phenomenology, with recent results related to symmetry breaking in superconductors, and give plausible kinematics to the emission process in the Podkletlov and Poher experiments.

show abstract

“…The major feature of the phenomenon is that, under intense light beam illumination ( 1 kW cm −2 ), the ferromagnetic particles always move along the lines of force in a magnetic field (along co-axial trajectories with respect to the current [8]) independently of the angle between the light beam direction, , and the magnetic field intensity vector, H. Reversal of the magnetic field, H, causes a reversal of particle motion (which is not the case with magnetic dipoles). Reduction of the light field causes the particles to stop moving; an increase in field strength or light intensity causes a rise in particle velocity, whereas a decrease results in reduced particle velocity; the number of particles moving in the direction of the magnetic field appears to equal the number of particles moving in the opposite direction.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%