2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4371(02)01923-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of mammalian similarity through allometric scaling laws

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5 Many different explanations have been put forward for the scaling laws, ranging from four-dimensional biology. 6 and quantum statistics 7 to long-bone allometry combined with muscular development, 8 but, as yet, the debate is far from being settled. In this letter we suggest that multicellular tumor spheroids (MTS) are excellent experimental model systems to test the validity of the proposed mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 Many different explanations have been put forward for the scaling laws, ranging from four-dimensional biology. 6 and quantum statistics 7 to long-bone allometry combined with muscular development, 8 but, as yet, the debate is far from being settled. In this letter we suggest that multicellular tumor spheroids (MTS) are excellent experimental model systems to test the validity of the proposed mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies of the peak stress measured in the midshaft of long bones in fast walking, moderately running (or trotting) animals, and fast running (or galloping) animals with smoothly changing speed, resulted in that σ (max) bone (M, V) is a linear piecewise function of speed, which domains are limited by the gait-dependent "speed-equivalent" points V (max) trans , as suggested by Biewener & Taylor (1986). When the allometric data from individual bones in running mammals are generalized to effective limb bone (e.g., Kokshenev, 2003), the corresponding peak functional stress is suggested here in the form…”
Section: Dynamic Strain and Stress Similaritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been in particular demonstrated that the consistency between the elastic strain similarity by Rubin & Lanyon (1982, 1984 and the elastic static stress similarity by McMahon (1975a) exists, since both are underlaid by the same patterns of elastic forces emerging in solids, that can be revealed if the external gravitational forces are substituted by predominating functional muscular forces (Kokshenev, 2003;Kokshenev et al, 2003). In this chapter, we try to establish a link between the mechanical elastic similarity in limb bones of different-sized animals (McMahon, 1973(McMahon, , 1975aRubin & Lanyon, 1982, 1984Kokshenev, 2003Kokshenev, , 2007 and the seminal dynamic similarity in locomotion of animals (Alexander, 1976(Alexander, , 1989Alexander & Jayes, 1983), arising in turn from the more general mechanical similarity of uniform classical systems (Kokshenev, 2011a, b). Following Schmidt-Neielsen (1984), it has been widely recognized that body mass is often a major locomotory factor scaling muscle force output establishing limits for body ability in animals (Alexander, 1985b;Hutchinson & Garcia, 2002;Biewener, 2005, Hutchinson et al, 2005Marden, 2005), through their maximal speed (Garland, 1983;Jones & Lindstedt, 1993;Sellers & Manning, 2007) and maximal size (Hokkanen, 1986a;Biewener, 1989;Kokshenev, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations