2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.130.091902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of e+eωχbJ(

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Born cross section ratio between 𝑒 + 𝑒 − → 𝜔𝜒 𝑏1,𝑏2 (1𝑃 ) and 𝑒 + 𝑒 − → 𝜋 + 𝜋 − 𝛶 (𝑛𝑆) (𝑛 = 1, 2, 3) is about 1.5 at √ 𝑠 = 10.745 GeV and 0.15 at √ 𝑠 = 10.867 GeV. [83,84] This indicates different internal structures for 𝛶 (10753) and 𝛶 (10860), which otherwise have the same quantum numbers and are only 110 MeV/𝑐 2 apart.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Born cross section ratio between 𝑒 + 𝑒 − → 𝜔𝜒 𝑏1,𝑏2 (1𝑃 ) and 𝑒 + 𝑒 − → 𝜋 + 𝜋 − 𝛶 (𝑛𝑆) (𝑛 = 1, 2, 3) is about 1.5 at √ 𝑠 = 10.745 GeV and 0.15 at √ 𝑠 = 10.867 GeV. [83,84] This indicates different internal structures for 𝛶 (10753) and 𝛶 (10860), which otherwise have the same quantum numbers and are only 110 MeV/𝑐 2 apart.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Using these data, measurement of 𝑒 + 𝑒 − → 𝜔𝜒 𝑏𝐽 (1𝑃 ) (𝐽 = 0, 1, 2) was performed. [83] The Born cross sections of 𝑒 + 𝑒 − → 𝜔𝜒 𝑏1,𝑏2 (1𝑃 ) as a function of √ 𝑠 are shown in Fig. 5, where the 𝛶 (10753) → 𝜔𝜒 𝑏1,𝑏2 (1𝑃 ) signal is clear.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the ratio B [Y(10753)→𝜔 𝜒 𝑏1 (1𝑃) ] B [Y(10753)→𝜔 𝜒 𝑏2 (1𝑃) ] is expected to be about 1/5 [14]. We tested these predictions by measuring the 𝜎(𝑒 + 𝑒 − → 𝜔 𝜒 𝑏𝐽 (1𝑃)) cross section [15]. An analogous measurement was made at Belle at √ 𝑠 =10.867 GeV [16].…”
Section: Gevmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the ratio B [𝑌 (10753)→𝜔 𝜒 𝑏1 (1𝑃) ] B [𝑌 (10753)→𝜔 𝜒 𝑏2 (1𝑃) ] is expected to be about 1/5 [13]. We present the measurement of the energy dependence of the cross sections 𝜎(𝑒 + 𝑒 − → 𝜔𝜒 𝑏𝐽 (1𝑃)) [14], and the comparison with the analogous measurement by Belle at a higher centerof-mass energy [15]. The reconstruction of the 𝜔 𝜒 𝑏𝐽 (1𝑃) final state is fully exclusive.…”
Section: Pos(fpcp2023)087mentioning
confidence: 99%