Observation of neutrino-like interactions without muon or electron in the Gargamelle neutrino experiment

Hasert, F.J.; Kabe, S.; Krenz, W.; Krogh, J. von; Lanske, D.; Morfín, J.; Schultze, K.; Weerts, H.; Bertrand-Coremans, G.; Sacton, J.; Doninck, W. Van; Vilain, P.; Baldi, Ranieri D.; Camerini, U.; Cundy, D.; Danilchenko, I. A.; Fry, William F.; Haidt, D.; Natali, S.; Musset, P.; Osculati, B.; Palmer, R.B.; Pattison, J.B.M.; Perkins, D. H.; Pullia, A.; Rousset, A.; Vénus, W.; Wachsmuth, H.; Brisson, V.; Degrange, B.; Haguenauer, M.; Kluberg, L.; Nguyen-Khac, U.; Petiau, P.; Bellotti, E.; Bonetti, S.; Cavalli, D.; Conta, C.; Fiorini, E.; Rollier, M.; Aubert, B.; Blum, D.; Chounet, L.‐M.; Heusse, P.; Lagarrigue, A.; Lutz, A.M.; Orkin-Lecourtois, A.; Vialle, J.P.; Bullock, F. W.; Esten, M.J.; Jones, T. W.; McKenzie, J.; Michette, A. G.; Myatt, G.; Scott, W. G.

doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90038-8

Cited by 160 publications

(102 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Because of its success in explaining a wide variety of experimental results, the Standard Model is widely accepted in particle physics [6][7][8][9][10]. However, its deficiencies that are inconsistent with general relativity, and give no explanation of the origin of mass, the strong CP problem, the neutrino oscillations, the matter-antimatter asymmetry and the nature of dark matter and dark energy, and in particular that the Higgs particle (also called the God particle ) has not yet been discovered, allow us to raise doubt on the Standard Model and related theories [11][12][13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

"universe collapse model" and its roles in the unification of four fundamental forces and the origin and the evolution of the universe

Dai¹

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To unify the four known fundamental forces and provide an explanation for the origin and the evolution of the universe are two long-term goals of theoretical physics. Here a "universe collapse model" has been proposed. The universe consists of Matter and No-matter. Nomatter is the universal energy that constructs a consistent universe field, presenting a spiral wave motion at the speed of light at the small scale. The partial collapse of the universal energy forms the particles of the universal energy in a variety of sizes, which are called as the elementary particles. These elementary particles form atom and matter, which construct the galaxies. The collapse of the universe field induces the formation of the universe collapse potential (UCP) and universe collapse force (UCF), and the later is represented by four different aspects of the fundamental forces at the large or small scales. The mathematical equation and the derivation of UCP and UCF are described, and possible experimental tests are also suggested. Therefore, this new model may give a novel explanation for the unification of four fundamental forces and the origin and the evolution of the universe.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

"universe collapse model" and its roles in the unification of four fundamental forces and the origin and the evolution of the universe

Dai¹

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Neutron background was caused by neutrons mimicking the NC within the visible chamber without the neutrons being associable with the charged currents they were triggered off by (see Figure 2). In order to argue for background-free NC events, physicists at CERN sought to exploit the spatial distribution of the NC and neutrons respectively across the chamber (Hasert et al 1973b(Hasert et al , 1974. Miller and Bullock (1994) in their historical analysis of the discovery of the NC write:…”

Section: An Argument 'Beyond Doubt'?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…See main text for details. Adapted from Hasert (1973b) years after the NC was accepted as real (Blietschau et al 1977). 10 Nonetheless, as it should turn out in due course the early results of the Gargamelle collaboration were signiªcantly too low.…”

Section: An Argument 'Beyond Doubt'?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The precise values are as follows. Gargamelle: R ϭ .22 Ϯ .03; R bar ϭ .45 Ϯ .09 (Hasert et al 1974) as compared to R ϭ .32 Ϯ .03; R bar ϭ .39 Ϯ .07 (Bosetti et al 1978). HPWF: R ϭ .20 Ϯ .05 (mixed beam) (Aubert et al 1974a) as compared to R ϭ .30 Ϯ .04; R bar ϭ .39 Ϯ .09 (Wanderer et al 1978).…”

Section: Fake Convergencementioning

confidence: 99%

“…As both the Gargamelle and the HPWF group pointed out, their results admitted different interpretations; they did not have to be interpreted in terms of the NC as predicted by the GWS model (Hasert et al 1973b;Benvenuti et al 1974). Both groups in fact explicitly listed these alternative interpretations in their discovery articles, which could not be excluded as alternative interpretations.…”

Section: Alternative Interpretationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Matter of Kuhnian Theory-Choice? The GWS Model and the Neutral Current

Schindler

2014

Perspectives on Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the Kuhnian view of theory choice, theories, as a matter of empirical fact, often score differently with regard to the standard theoretical virtues. The case I discuss in this paper, however, is a case in which there was one theory which was more virtuous than all its competitors. In such cases practitioners' disparate weighting preferences, which Kuhn is so keen to emphasize, make no difference to theory choice: practitioners' choices will converge on one theory despite their different weighting preferences. The case I discuss in this paper concerns the Glashow-Weinberg-Salam (GWS) model of electroweak interactions in the early 1970s. After considering the contemporary experimental evidence in its favor in detail, I argue that the GWS model was chosen not because the evidence in its favor was compelling, but rather because its virtues exceeded those of its competitors.

show abstract

Weak Interactions

1987

Introduction to Elementary Particles

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Observation of neutrino-like interactions without muon or electron in the Gargamelle neutrino experiment

Cited by 160 publications

References 8 publications

"universe collapse model" and its roles in the unification of four fundamental forces and the origin and the evolution of the universe

"universe collapse model" and its roles in the unification of four fundamental forces and the origin and the evolution of the universe

A Matter of Kuhnian Theory-Choice? The GWS Model and the Neutral Current

Weak Interactions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Observation of neutrino-like interactions without muon or electron in the Gargamelle neutrino experiment

Cited by 160 publications

References 8 publications

&quot;universe collapse model&quot; and its roles in the unification of four fundamental forces and the origin and the evolution of the universe

&quot;universe collapse model&quot; and its roles in the unification of four fundamental forces and the origin and the evolution of the universe

A Matter of Kuhnian Theory-Choice? The GWS Model and the Neutral Current

Weak Interactions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

"universe collapse model" and its roles in the unification of four fundamental forces and the origin and the evolution of the universe

"universe collapse model" and its roles in the unification of four fundamental forces and the origin and the evolution of the universe