1959
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.3.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Nuclear Resonance in a Ferromagnet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
46
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed broadening is attributed to a combination of the hyperfine interaction associated with the interaction between the nuclear spin and its own electron shell, and the local spin/electron distributions. 7 The frequency positions of the fitted bands are in good agreement with the previously reported 59 Co NMR studies by Gossard and Portis, 7 and Sort et al 15 The 59 Co NMR results are summarized in Table I. Based on the spectral fitting, it was found that the untreated Co powder consists of 20Ϯ 3% unfaulted fcc, 52Ϯ 3% unfaulted hcp, 10Ϯ 3% hcp deformation faults, and 19Ϯ 3% fcc deformation faults.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observed broadening is attributed to a combination of the hyperfine interaction associated with the interaction between the nuclear spin and its own electron shell, and the local spin/electron distributions. 7 The frequency positions of the fitted bands are in good agreement with the previously reported 59 Co NMR studies by Gossard and Portis, 7 and Sort et al 15 The 59 Co NMR results are summarized in Table I. Based on the spectral fitting, it was found that the untreated Co powder consists of 20Ϯ 3% unfaulted fcc, 52Ϯ 3% unfaulted hcp, 10Ϯ 3% hcp deformation faults, and 19Ϯ 3% fcc deformation faults.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Since cobalt is a ferromagnetic metal, conventional 59 Co NMR cannot be applied. Internal field 59 Co NMR of ferromagnetic Co was first observed in 1959 by Gossard and Portis,7 and since then the application of internal-field NMR to ferromagnetic materials has developed considerably. [8][9][10] There has been an extensive subsequent use of 59 Co NMR to characterize the different Co atomic environments ͓fcc, hcp, and sfs͔ in Co metal, [11][12][13][14][15] in Co films, [16][17][18][19] in catalysts, 20,21 and in alloys.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 In EuO the magnetic anisotropy is low and consequently the amplification factor for nuclei in domain walls is not substantially stronger than for nuclei in domains. Indeed, the amplification in domains is given by η Domain = |H hf |/|H an + H int |, where H hf is the hyperfine field, H an is the anisotropy field and H int is the internal field defined as the sum of the external field, the demagnetization field and the Lorentz field 21 . The amplification in a domain wall of a spherical particle is given by η DW = πD|H hf |/(N δ|M (T )|), where N is the demagnetization factor of the domain, D is the domain size, δ is the width of the domain wall and M (T ) is the magnetization in domains at temperature T, 22 and therefore:…”
Section: B Remarks On Amplification Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[77,78]. ·ÂÓÂÍÕÇÓÐÞÇ ÑÔÑÃÇÐÐÑÔÕË (à××ÇÍÕ ÖÔËÎÇÐËâ ÄÑÊÃÖÉAEÂáÜÇÅÑ ÒÑÎâ ÒÓË ÒÇÓÇÑÓËÇÐ-ÕÂÙËË ÐÂÏÂÅÐËÚÇÐÐÑÔÕË AEÑÏÇÐÑÄ) ËÏÇÇÕ Á®² Ä ×ÇÓÓÑ-ÏÂÅÐÇÕËÍÂØ [79], ÐÂÃÎáAEÈÐÐÞÌ ÊÐÂÚËÕÇÎßÐÑ ÒÑÊAEÐÇÇ [80].…”
Section: £äçAeçðëç°ãüââ øâóâíõçóëôõëíâ ïçõñAeñä ïâåðëõðñåñ óçêñðâðôâunclassified