1991
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.67.3026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of pair currents in superconductor-semiconductor contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

17
261
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
17
261
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, this model is not applicable to the wide spectral features with complex shapes corresponding to the Andreev reflection at the induced gap interface observed in our experiments and in previous low-T c work 23,24,27,28 . Moreover, our experimental results are also different from the low-T c results 25,39 . Our measurements show a proximity-induced gap feature with a wide region, appearing immediately below T c with almost twice the normal conductance (Figs 3c and 4b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, this model is not applicable to the wide spectral features with complex shapes corresponding to the Andreev reflection at the induced gap interface observed in our experiments and in previous low-T c work 23,24,27,28 . Moreover, our experimental results are also different from the low-T c results 25,39 . Our measurements show a proximity-induced gap feature with a wide region, appearing immediately below T c with almost twice the normal conductance (Figs 3c and 4b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The proximity-induced superconductivity was established in low-T c junctions with a metal 23,24 , or a semiconductor 25,26 as the N-contact. Specifically, Andreev reflection features with the width corresponding to the induced gap in the normal material, along with a reduced gap in the superconductor, were shown to manifest the signature of the proximity effect 23,24,27,28 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known that the proximity effect in N/S structures induces a condensate in the normal metal which causes a subgap conductance in N/S junctions. 52,53 In order to quantify the proximity effect, we need boundary conditions that take into account the spin filtering at the N/S barrier. Surprisingly, in spite of many works on N/S and F /S structures such boundary conditions are absent in the literature.…”
Section: Subgap Conductance In N/i Sf /S Junctions: Effective Boumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pioneering work of Kastalsky et al, 19 most studies of AR in semiconductors have been carried out in a two-dimensional ͑2D͒ geometry. This is not surprising, as serious problems are anticipated for AR experiments in a superconductor-semiconductor ͑S/Sm͒ junction in a threedimensional ͑3D͒ geometry because of the high resistivity of semiconductors at low temperatures and the presence of a Schottky barrier in most S / Sm contacts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%