2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53525-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of scalable sub-Poissonian-field lasing in a microlaser

Abstract: Sub-Poisson field with much reduced fluctuations in a cavity can boost quantum precision measurements via cavity-enhanced light-matter interactions. Strong coupling between an atom and a cavity mode has been utilized to generate highly sub-Poisson fields. However, a macroscopic number of optical intracavity photons with more than 3 dB variance reduction has not been possible. Here, we report sub-Poisson field lasing in a microlaser operating with hundreds of atoms with well-regulated atom-cavity coupling and i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of frequency pushing is maximized at ∆ cp /2π ∼ ±1 MHz and the maximum frequency pushing is 41±7 kHz/per atom. This value is about 20 times larger than the maximum frequency pulling per atom observed in the cavity-QED microlaser [11] with N ∼ 250 and g/2π ≃ 190 kHz -well above the lasing threshold in the highly nonlinear region -generating intensity squeezed output [4]. The frequency pulling in the microlaser was influenced by many factors such as quantum jumps [24] and photon number stabilization [4], so a direct comparison with the frequency pushing here is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The magnitude of frequency pushing is maximized at ∆ cp /2π ∼ ±1 MHz and the maximum frequency pushing is 41±7 kHz/per atom. This value is about 20 times larger than the maximum frequency pulling per atom observed in the cavity-QED microlaser [11] with N ∼ 250 and g/2π ≃ 190 kHz -well above the lasing threshold in the highly nonlinear region -generating intensity squeezed output [4]. The frequency pulling in the microlaser was influenced by many factors such as quantum jumps [24] and photon number stabilization [4], so a direct comparison with the frequency pushing here is difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This value is about 20 times larger than the maximum frequency pulling per atom observed in the cavity-QED microlaser [11] with N ∼ 250 and g/2π ≃ 190 kHz -well above the lasing threshold in the highly nonlinear region -generating intensity squeezed output [4]. The frequency pulling in the microlaser was influenced by many factors such as quantum jumps [24] and photon number stabilization [4], so a direct comparison with the frequency pushing here is difficult. But one of the reasons why the present frequency shift is larger than those in the previous studies by an order of magnitude is that the frequency shift was maximized here by choosing the experimental conditions very close to the EP, near which we can still have a single peak lineshape while getting closer to the strong atom-cavity coupling regime.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The statistical properties of a light beam generated through a certain quantum optical system can be studied in the three regimes such as sub-Poissonian [32][33][34][35], super-Poissonian [36], and Poissonian ones. These photon statistical distributions are characterized by comparing the variance of the photon The light beams which possess the super-Poissonian photon statistics satisfy the mathematical inequality Δ𝑛 2 > 𝑛.…”
Section: Photon Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%