2019
DOI: 10.1134/s1063773719110057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of the Second LIGO/Virgo Event Connected with a Binary Neutron Star Merger S190425z in the Gamma-Ray Range

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A weak Gamma Ray Burst, GRB 190425, was detected by the Anti-Coincidence Shield (ACS) of the SPI gamma-ray spectrometer onboard INTEGRAL [176], but not confirmed by Fermi-GBM [118] (see also [169], [212]). The time profile of GRB 190425 (two pulses at 0.5 and 5.9 s after the merger) is similar to that of GW170817 [200]. The absence of an optical counterpart could be explained by a large inclination of the jet axis with respect to the observer [200].…”
Section: Pos(golden2019)052mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A weak Gamma Ray Burst, GRB 190425, was detected by the Anti-Coincidence Shield (ACS) of the SPI gamma-ray spectrometer onboard INTEGRAL [176], but not confirmed by Fermi-GBM [118] (see also [169], [212]). The time profile of GRB 190425 (two pulses at 0.5 and 5.9 s after the merger) is similar to that of GW170817 [200]. The absence of an optical counterpart could be explained by a large inclination of the jet axis with respect to the observer [200].…”
Section: Pos(golden2019)052mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The time profile of GRB 190425 (two pulses at 0.5 and 5.9 s after the merger) is similar to that of GW170817 [200]. The absence of an optical counterpart could be explained by a large inclination of the jet axis with respect to the observer [200].…”
Section: Pos(golden2019)052mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The secondary component of the GW190521 binary was inferred to have m 2 = 66 +0. 28 −0.34 M , which means that this was the heaviest system detected by LIGO-Virgo to date, with a total mass M = m 1 + m 2 = 150 +29 −17 M . The remnant formed in this merger had a correspondingly large mass of m f = 142 +28 −16 M , making it the first confirmed intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH), i.e., a hole in the range 10 2 −10 5 M .…”
Section: Gw190521mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…9 Unlike for that first BNS detection, however, there was no confirmed electromagnetic counterpart associated with this GW trigger (although see Ref. [28]). Although both LIGO Livingston and Virgo were collecting data at the time, GW190425's network signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 12.9 was overwhelmingly a Unless otherwise noted, all quantities reported in this review consist of the median and the symmetric 90%-credible interval around it.…”
Section: Gw190425mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this observing period, two merger events possibly involving neutron stars were reported by the LIGO-Virgo consortium: GW190425, caused by the coalescence of two compact objects of masses each in the range 1.12-2.52 M ⊙ , at ∼ 160 Mpc (Abbott et al, 2020a), and GW190814, caused by a 23 M ⊙ black hole merging with a compact object of 2.6 M ⊙ at ∼ 240 Mpc (Abbott et al, 2020b). In neither case did the search for an optical or infrared counterpart return a positive result (Coughlin et al, 2019;Gomez et al, 2019;Ackley et al, 2020;Andreoni et al, 2020;Antier et al, 2020;, owing presumably to the large distance and sky error areas, although a short GRB may have been detected by the INTEGRAL SPI-ACS simultaneously with GW190425 (Pozanenko et al, 2019). Note that all coalescing stars may have been black holes, as the neutron star nature of the binary members lighter than 3 M ⊙ could not be confirmed.…”
Section: Summary and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 98%