2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.075207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of the symmetry of core states of a single Fe impurity in GaAs

Abstract: Bocquel, J.; Kortan, V.R.; Campion, R.P.; Gallagher, B.L.; Flatté, M.E.; Koenraad, P.M. Published in:Physical Review B DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.075207Published: 23/08/2017 Document VersionPublisher's PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)Please check the document version of this publication:• A submitted manuscript is the author's version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These comparisons suggest that there is not the difference present that should exist based on other models [73,74,150] and has been recently observed [119] between the spatial extent of the symmetry split d wavefunctions in this particular spds * tight-binding model. In order to explore this lack of contrast in wavefunction spatial extent it is helpful to examine each symmetry state, d(t 2 ) and d(e), and how it relates to the different tight-binding bonding symmetries, σ, π and δ.…”
Section: Comparison Of Transition Metal Dopants In Diamond and Galliumentioning
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These comparisons suggest that there is not the difference present that should exist based on other models [73,74,150] and has been recently observed [119] between the spatial extent of the symmetry split d wavefunctions in this particular spds * tight-binding model. In order to explore this lack of contrast in wavefunction spatial extent it is helpful to examine each symmetry state, d(t 2 ) and d(e), and how it relates to the different tight-binding bonding symmetries, σ, π and δ.…”
Section: Comparison Of Transition Metal Dopants In Diamond and Galliumentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Both tight-binding models [73,74] and density functional theory calculations [150] predict that the d(e) symmetry state will only bond with the host in a limited manner and the dopant wavefunctions will be smaller in spatial extent when compared to those of the d(t 2 ) level. This has been recently shown experimentally for a single iron impurity in gallium arsenide [119]. In a tight-binding model the extent of the wavefunction is governed by the hopping parameters between the host and dopant d levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations