1993
DOI: 10.1109/20.281288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of underlayer domain noise in perpendicular recording disks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were some investigations to evaluate the noise from double-layered perpendicular recording media [4][5][6]. The medium noise signal from double-layered perpendicular recording media have distinguished high-and low-frequency nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were some investigations to evaluate the noise from double-layered perpendicular recording media [4][5][6]. The medium noise signal from double-layered perpendicular recording media have distinguished high-and low-frequency nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, together with the narrow track width, decreases the head field significantly at high densities [2]. Furthermore, the SUL also deteriorates the readback resolution and sensitivity [3], [4] as well as introduces an extra noise due to Manuscript the domain walls formed in the SUL [5], which will directly cause a loss of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In terms of fabrication, depositing SUL and the interlayer also increases the cost of the media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%