2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.124.246802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Vanishing Charge Dispersion of a Nearly Open Superconducting Island

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(a). The interlaced sinusoidal qubit response as a function of V C (column average subtracted) represents the two charge parity branches, visible in the offset-chargesensitive regime, as investigated previously in conventional [31] and semiconducting junctions [12,13]. The simultaneous visibility of both parity branches indicates parity switching (poisoning) that is fast compared to the measurement time [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4(a). The interlaced sinusoidal qubit response as a function of V C (column average subtracted) represents the two charge parity branches, visible in the offset-chargesensitive regime, as investigated previously in conventional [31] and semiconducting junctions [12,13]. The simultaneous visibility of both parity branches indicates parity switching (poisoning) that is fast compared to the measurement time [31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Variants of the conventional metallic transmon qubit [1,2] based on a semiconductor nanowires (NWs) with an epitaxial superconducting shell have appeared recently and shown great promise for qubit applications, offering atomically precise interfaces and electrostatic control of junction properties [3][4][5][6][7]. By now, qubit spectroscopy [3], coherence [4], two-qubit operation [5], gatecontrolled qubit coupling [8], and dc monitoring [9] have been demonstrated, along with investigations of applied magnetic field [7], junction Andreev bound states [6,10], anharmonicity [11], charge dispersion [12,13], spin [14], and parity protection [15]. However, axial flux effects from a fully surrounding Al shell on Josephson coupling have not been considered previously.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superconductor-semiconductor-superconductor (S-Sm-S) nanowire Josephson junctions have been integrated into various superconducting circuits, including gate-voltagetunable transmon qubits, known as gatemons [1,2], tunable superconducting resonators [3], and Andreev qubits [4,5]. These hybrid junction elements allow in situ voltage control of their Andreev spectra and current-phase relation [6][7][8][9], in turn influencing measurable qubit properties such as anharmonicity [10] and charge dispersion [11,12]. Moreover, S-Sm nanowires in the presence of strong magnetic fields may host Majorana zero modes-as evidenced by both dc-tunneling and Coulomb-blockade-spectroscopy measurements [13,14]-potentially forming the basis of robust topological qubits [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panel (b) copied from Ref. [9]. Normalized two-tone spectroscopy measurements of the 0 → 1 transition versus the offset charge.…”
Section: Josephson Junctions Phenomenology and A Model Of A Single-junction Qubitmentioning
confidence: 99%