1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.50.3158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of vortex dynamics in two-dimensional Josephson-junction arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A vortex model is used for interpretation of the images. Earlier results for the limit of low vortex density in two-dimensional arrays may be found in [6]. from our investigations important conclusions on the optimization of Josephson junction arrays for oscillator applications can be drawn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…A vortex model is used for interpretation of the images. Earlier results for the limit of low vortex density in two-dimensional arrays may be found in [6]. from our investigations important conclusions on the optimization of Josephson junction arrays for oscillator applications can be drawn.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…24 When comparing the thresholds obtained numerically with those observed experimentally it is quite arbitrary to decide how small the screening current should be to lead to the disappearance of the signal measured by the LTSEM; therefore a detailed quantitative comparison is not possible on the basis of the results shown here. However, the measured threshold for an array 10ϫ10 critically damped (␣Ӎ1) is ␥Ӎ4, 24 a region where our simulations predict that the screening current is small: I s m Ӎ0.16 or roughly 4% of the bias current at most, i.e., for f ϭ0.5.…”
Section: Microscopic Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…16,17 Finally, there are reasons to believe that there might be a connection between the presence of significant screening currents and the phenomenon of ''row switching'' observed with the technique of LTSEM. 24 It is worth recalling that we have ͑a͒ neglected any spread of the parameters and ͑b͒ retained self-inductances only and neglected mutual inductances. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Current biasing the array above its critical current, we usually observe beam induced additional voltages ⌬V(x 0 ,y 0 ) from the array. [18][19][20] This voltage difference is recorded as a function of (x 0 ,y 0 ), yielding spatial information. For increasing the sensitivity, the electron beam is chopped at a frequency of about 20 kHz and the voltage response ⌬V is measured with a lock-in amplifier.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%