2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational cohort study in older women with early breast cancer: Use of radiation therapy and impact on health-related quality of life and mortality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to survival outcomes, radiotherapy-related toxicity and quality of life effects [42] are important endpoints to assess among older patients receiving radiotherapy. In a prospective multicentre cohort study of women aged 70 years and over with early breast cancer, with comprehensive measures of fitness and frailty, radiotherapy after BCS or mastectomy had an initial but temporary impact on quality of life [43]. This finding was reflected in a single institution analysis of women aged 70 years and over who received surgery (BCS or mastectomy) and postoperative radiotherapy, which suggested that age did not have an impact on radiotherapy-related toxicity [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to survival outcomes, radiotherapy-related toxicity and quality of life effects [42] are important endpoints to assess among older patients receiving radiotherapy. In a prospective multicentre cohort study of women aged 70 years and over with early breast cancer, with comprehensive measures of fitness and frailty, radiotherapy after BCS or mastectomy had an initial but temporary impact on quality of life [43]. This finding was reflected in a single institution analysis of women aged 70 years and over who received surgery (BCS or mastectomy) and postoperative radiotherapy, which suggested that age did not have an impact on radiotherapy-related toxicity [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 49 However, high rates of radiation therapy use are still observed, although there is high variability according to geographical region. 10 , 75 Results from the Bridging the Age Gap group show that radiation therapy use in the adjuvant setting is largely determined by patient age and the clinician’s observed risk of recurrence and, interestingly, less driven by geriatric assessment. 75 Overall, radiation therapy was well tolerated by older women, with only a transient decrease in quality of life.…”
Section: Clinical Trends In De-implementation In Low-risk Breast Cancer In Older Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 10 , 75 Results from the Bridging the Age Gap group show that radiation therapy use in the adjuvant setting is largely determined by patient age and the clinician’s observed risk of recurrence and, interestingly, less driven by geriatric assessment. 75 Overall, radiation therapy was well tolerated by older women, with only a transient decrease in quality of life. Even with tolerability, adjuvant radiation therapy can safely be de-escalated in older women in this setting; higher-grade or higher-stage tumours in the setting of cN0 disease do not increase the risk of recurrence.…”
Section: Clinical Trends In De-implementation In Low-risk Breast Cancer In Older Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most observational studies evaluating fatigue in breast cancer patients have been cross‐sectional studies that focused on acute fatigue, with assessments up to 6 months after treatment completion. Only a small proportion evaluated CRF beyond 6 months and, from those, even fewer focused on RT‐treated patients 8‐11 . More than 20 different instruments have been employed to evaluate CRF, contributing to a large heterogeneity in its measurement 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a small proportion evaluated CRF beyond 6 months and, from those, even fewer focused on RT-treated patients. [8][9][10][11] More than 20 different instruments have been employed to evaluate CRF, contributing to a large heterogeneity in its measurement. 12 Most studies used single-items or unidimensional rather than multidimensional questionnaires and were therefore unable to capture the multidimensional aspect of fatigue with its distinct fatigue dimensions (eg, mental, physical or emotional fatigue).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%