2023
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-324919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational cohort study of use of caffeine in preterm infants and association between early caffeine use and neonatal outcomes

Abstract: ObjectiveTo quantify trends in caffeine use in infants born at <32 weeks’ gestational age (GA), and to investigate the effects of early vs late caffeine on neonatal outcomes.Study designRetrospective propensity score matched cohort study using routinely recorded data from the National Neonatal Research Database of infants born at <32 weeks’ GA admitted to neonatal units in England and Wales (2012–2020).Results89% (58 913/66 081) of infants received caffeine. In 70%, caffeine was started early (on the day… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity Trial (CAP trial) [1], there was no significant difference in mortality between the caffeine group and the non-caffeine group. Otherwise, in studies conducted by Dobson et al [16], Patel et al [18], Shenk et al [23], Szatkowski et al [21], and Yun et al [14] as well as in this current meta-analysis, there was a significantly higher rate of mortality in the early caffeine group. Given the improvement in other outcomes, these results may potentially be due to survival bias favoring the late caffeine initiation group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity Trial (CAP trial) [1], there was no significant difference in mortality between the caffeine group and the non-caffeine group. Otherwise, in studies conducted by Dobson et al [16], Patel et al [18], Shenk et al [23], Szatkowski et al [21], and Yun et al [14] as well as in this current meta-analysis, there was a significantly higher rate of mortality in the early caffeine group. Given the improvement in other outcomes, these results may potentially be due to survival bias favoring the late caffeine initiation group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 40%
“…After removing duplicate records and studies that did not meet the eligibility criteria, 21 studies remained. Following the application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 11 studies were included in the final review [3,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Among the patients included in these 11 studies, 78,332 received early caffeine administration, while 44,237 received late caffeine administration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 26 This observation has some support from our recent report on the increasing use of early caffeine especially in extremely preterm infants during the same period. 27 The increasing popularity of less invasive surfactant administration 28 in more recent years may alter these patterns in the future, making these data useful for comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For workstream 1, we will include infants who: were born at <32 weeks' GA; survived at least 48 hours from birth; and were admitted for neonatal care from 1 January 2016 to 30 September 2023 to a neonatal unit contributing data to the NNRD. In line with previous work, 18 19 we will exclude infants with missing data on key characteristics (eg, sex, GA, final discharge destination) as well as infants admitted >12 hours after birth and those missing data for one or more episodes of care.…”
Section: Eligibility Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%