2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl083990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational Evidence for Two Modes of Coupling Between Sea Surface Temperatures, Tropospheric Temperature Profile, and Shortwave Cloud Radiative Effect in the Tropics

Abstract: Tropical average shortwave cloud radiative effect (SWCRE) anomalies observed by CERES/EBAF v4 are explained by observed average sea surface temperature ( trueSST‾) and the difference between the warmest 30% where deep convection occurs and trueSST‾false(SST#). Observed tropospheric temperatures show variations in boundary layer capping strength over time consistent with the evolution of SST#. The CERES/EBAF v4 data confirm that associated cloud fraction changes over the colder waters dominate SWCRE. This obse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method consistently overestimates the change in TOA flux over the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic, and so overestimates the sensitivity. The method finds that that there are significant negative nonlocal feedbacks associated with regions of tropical convection, and that the reduction in the share of warming that occurs in these regions over time contributes to an increase in the global feedback with time in these models, consistent with recent studies (Andrews and Webb 2017;Ceppi and Gregory 2017;Dong et al 2019;Fueglistaler 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method consistently overestimates the change in TOA flux over the Southern Ocean and North Atlantic, and so overestimates the sensitivity. The method finds that that there are significant negative nonlocal feedbacks associated with regions of tropical convection, and that the reduction in the share of warming that occurs in these regions over time contributes to an increase in the global feedback with time in these models, consistent with recent studies (Andrews and Webb 2017;Ceppi and Gregory 2017;Dong et al 2019;Fueglistaler 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Since warming in different regions sets off radiative feedbacks of different strengths, the inconstancy of the climate feedback is likely caused by the change in the spatial pattern of warming with time (Winton et al 2010;Armour et al 2013). Since the temperature pattern associated with internal variability differs from the forced response, we should expect the climate feedback associated with each to differ (Dessler 2013;Colman and Hanson 2017), and in fact the climate feedback appears to vary across the historical record (Gregory and Andrews 2016;Fueglistaler 2019). The climate feedback may vary between historical and future warming (Zhou et al 2016;Proistosescu and Huybers 2017;Andrews et al 2018), although the importance of this effect may be modest (Lewis and Curry 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has shown that on interannual, decadal, and longer time scales, EIS depends on the spatial pattern of surface temperatures, especially on the temperature difference between warm convective areas and the rest of the tropics (Ceppi & Gregory, 2017; Fueglistaler, 2019; Qu et al., 2015; Zhou et al., 2016). Monthly EIS anomalies are positively correlated ( R = 0.54) with anomalies of the SST # index proposed by Fueglistaler (2019) (defined as the surface temperature difference between the 30% warmest waters minus the tropical average SST), thus suggesting that EIS variations are partly controlled by the spatial pattern of surface temperature. We also note a strong anticorrelation between EIS and relative humidity in the free troposphere (Table 1).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of satellite observations has confirmed that for given conditions of large‐scale circulation and surface temperature at the regional scale, situations associated with an enhanced convective aggregation are associated with decreased humidity, decreased upper‐level cloudiness, increased outgoing longwave radiation (OLR), and decreased planetary albedo (Holloway et al., 2017; Stein et al., 2017; Tobin et al., 2012, 2013). However, these relationships might be affected by variations of sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and large‐scale atmospheric circulations (Fueglistaler, 2019; Zhang & Fueglistaler, 2019). It also remains an open issue as to whether the radiative influence of changes in convective aggregation is significant compared to that of other well‐established controlling factors such as the lower tropospheric stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formulation of the parameter used here follows the work of Flannaghan et al. (2014) and Fueglistaler (2019), and is deliberately oblivious to the geographic pattern of SSTs as the specific geographic location of deep convection is secondary to this problem. The approach is on safe theoretical grounds in the tropics (see also Y. Zhang & Fueglistaler, 2020) and observations of tropical SSTs, atmospheric temperature and top‐of‐atmosphere radiative fluxes are consistent with expectations (Fueglistaler, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%