2013
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational evidence that massive cluster galaxies were forming stars atz~ 2.5 and did not grow in mass at later times

Abstract: Using Spitzer 3.6 micron data we derived the luminosity function and the mass function of galaxies in five z > 1.4 clusters selected to have a firm intracluster medium detection. The five clusters differ in richness (ISCS J1438.1+3414 and XMMXCS J2215.9-1738 are twice as rich as ISCS J1432.4+3250, IDCS J1426.5+3508, and JKCS 041) and morphological appareance. At the median redshift z = 1.5, from the 150 member galaxies of the five clusters, we derived a characteristic magnitude of 16.92 ± 0.13 in the [3.6] ban… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
17
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
6
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our result is consistent with the conclusions drawn in Andreon (2013), which suggest that mass build-up in massive cluster galaxies is mostly complete by z 1.8…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our result is consistent with the conclusions drawn in Andreon (2013), which suggest that mass build-up in massive cluster galaxies is mostly complete by z 1.8…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Saracco, Longhetti & Andreon 2009;Williams et al 2010;Poggianti et al 2013; but see Trujillo, Ferreras &de la Rosa 2011 andAndreon 2013). If this dependence is true, it implies that the selected galaxies will be the most compact ones, posing a strong selection bias when comparing to a local population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the cluster ETGs are largely passively evolving since at least z∼ 1.2 (e.g. Andreon 2008;de Propris, Phillipps & Bremer 2013), with its red-sequence being already in place at even higher redshifts (e.g. Bower, Lucey & Ellis 1992, Kodama & Arimoto 1997Blakeslee et al 2003;de Lucia et al 2007;Faber et al 2007) and showing no significant evolution on the Fundamental Plane (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, cluster cores in the nearby Universe host the most massive early-type galaxies, containing stars nearly as old as the Universe, and producing the tight red sequence in the colormagnitude diagram of cluster galaxies (Visvanathan & Sandage 1977;Bower et al 1992;Kodama & Arimoto 1997) that is often considered to be a defining signature of high-density environments at low and intermediate redshifts. Most studies of the evolution of the red sequence and of the cluster galaxy luminosity function up to z ∼ 1−1.3 largely agree on a broad-brush picture where the high-mass end of the cluster galaxy population is largely in place even before redshift one, with the bulk of its stars formed in a massive star formation event in the cluster progenitor environments at z ∼ 2 or higher (e.g., De Propris et al 1999Propris et al , 2007Andreon 2006Andreon , 2013Strazzullo et al 2006Strazzullo et al , 2010Lin et al 2006;Lidman et al 2008;Mei et al 2009;Mancone et al 2010;Wylezalek et al 2014;Foltz et al 2015), followed by efficient suppression of star formation in a major part of the massive galaxy population, creating a first red sequence (e.g., Kodama et al 2007;Zirm et al 2008;Strazzullo et al 2016). Direct observations of the star formation suppression in high-redshift clusters add important constraints to this broad-brush picture (e.g., Muzzin et al 2014;Balogh et al 2016;Noble et al 2016;Rudnick et al 2017) concerning time scales, relevance, and actual nature of environmental effects (e.g., Wetzel et al 2012Wetzel et al , 2013Hirschmann et al 2014;Bahé et al 2017, and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%