2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.05.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational safety study of febrile convulsion following first dose MMRV vaccination in a managed care setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
62
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study further confirmed (by using previously unanalyzed data) that MMRV and MMR + V are both associated with fever and seizure 7 to 10 days after vaccination, and validated our previous findings and those of others that MMRV versus MMR + V is associated with an excess risk of seizures 7 to 10 days after vaccination. 19,20,[34][35][36] This study replicated previously reported safety findings, which provides additional reassurance that assessing the 7 main outcomes with this approach was reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study further confirmed (by using previously unanalyzed data) that MMRV and MMR + V are both associated with fever and seizure 7 to 10 days after vaccination, and validated our previous findings and those of others that MMRV versus MMR + V is associated with an excess risk of seizures 7 to 10 days after vaccination. 19,20,[34][35][36] This study replicated previously reported safety findings, which provides additional reassurance that assessing the 7 main outcomes with this approach was reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In 2008, Rapid Cycle Analysis monitoring detected increased risk for seizures in 12-to 23-month-old children after MMRV, 18 although not for other safety outcomes. Follow-up studies verified that MMRV is associated with an approximately twofold increased risk of fever and febrile seizures 7 to 10 days after vaccination compared with separate MMR + V. 19,20 The CDC subsequently recommended that either MMRV or MMR + V could be administered to 1-to 2-year-olds receiving their first doses; however, families without a strong preference for MMRV should receive MMR + V. 21 A subsequent study in 4-to 6-year-olds detected no association between MMRV or MMR + V and an increased risk of fever or febrile seizure. 22 Because it is clear that MMRV compared with MMR + V has a higher risk of febrile seizures, we hypothesized that MMRV may present a higher risk for additional safety outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…6,7 It is likely that our study also included some children who did not respond to their first dose of MMR and subsequently had a febrile response after MMRV or MMR + V at 4 to 6 years; however, we were unable to specifically identify those potentially vulnerable individuals. Prelicensure studies have not reported differences in postvaccination fever rates between 4-and 6-year-olds receiving MMRV or MMR + V as a second dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2008, MMRV RCA safety monitoring detected a possible increased risk for seizures after receipt of MMRV. 4 Subsequent studies confirmed that among toddlers 12 to 23 months old, ages when the risk for febrile seizure peaks, 5 measlescontaining vaccines were associated with elevated risk of fever and febrile seizure and MMRV was associated with an ∼2-fold increased risk of fever and febrile seizures occurring 7 to 10 days after MMRV compared with separately administered MMR + V. 6,7 One additional febrile seizure occurred for every 2300 doses of MMRV administered instead of separate MMR + V in 1-year-old children. 6 This finding led to the CDC' s 2010 recommendation that while either MMRV or MMR + V may be administered to 1-to 2-year-olds receiving their first doses, families without a strong preference for MMRV should receive MMR + V. 8 MMR administered as a second dose to 4-to 6-year-old children has not been reported to have an association with an increased risk for febrile seizures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[1][2][3][4] Because we initially defined the 42-day surveillance period, we also examined seizure risk for days 0 to 42, as well as days 0 to 30, to permit comparison with the results of a recent study on MMRV vaccination and febrile seizures. 15 Using the electronic data, we used Poisson regression to compare seizure risk across the 4 different vaccine exposures during days 7 to 10, as well as 5 other risk windows (days 0 -4, 5-6, 11-12, 13-30, and 31-42). Additional covariates adjusted for 5 age groups (12, 13-14, 15-16, 17-19, and 20 -23 months), 7 VSD sites, respiratory virus seasons (November 1 to April 30 versus May 1 to October 31 16 ), and 9 calendar years (2000 -2008).…”
Section: Assessment Of the Effect Of Mmrv On Seizure Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%