2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observational signatures of SNIa progenitors, as predicted by models

Abstract: A definitive determination of the progenitors of type Ia supernovae (SNIa) has been a conundrum for decades. The single degenerate scenario -a white dwarf (WD) in a semi-detached binary system accreting mass from its secondary -is a plausible path; however, no simulation to date has shown that such an outcome is possible. In this study, we allowed a WD with a near Chandrasekhar mass of 1.4M ⊙ to evolve over tens of thousands of nova cycles, accumulating mass secularly while undergoing periodic nova eruptions. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several explanations have been proposed to explain the existence of single low-mass WDs: merger events either during common-envelope evolution or of two very low-mass WDs (Nelemans, 2010;Brown et al, 2011); sub-stellar companions that help to eject the envelope and get evaporated or suffer a merge (Nelemans & Tauris, 1998); strong mass loss in metal-rich stars close to the tip of the first giant branch (Kilic et al, 2007;Brown et al, 2011;Han et al, 1994;Meng et al, 2008); remnants of the companion stars in type Ia Supernovae (Justham et al, 2009;Wang & Han, 2009). However, none of this channels has been able to convincingly reproduce the observed fraction so far (see Zorotovic & Schreiber, 2017, for a review).…”
Section: Single Low-mass Wdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several explanations have been proposed to explain the existence of single low-mass WDs: merger events either during common-envelope evolution or of two very low-mass WDs (Nelemans, 2010;Brown et al, 2011); sub-stellar companions that help to eject the envelope and get evaporated or suffer a merge (Nelemans & Tauris, 1998); strong mass loss in metal-rich stars close to the tip of the first giant branch (Kilic et al, 2007;Brown et al, 2011;Han et al, 1994;Meng et al, 2008); remnants of the companion stars in type Ia Supernovae (Justham et al, 2009;Wang & Han, 2009). However, none of this channels has been able to convincingly reproduce the observed fraction so far (see Zorotovic & Schreiber, 2017, for a review).…”
Section: Single Low-mass Wdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observed intervals between eruptions range from ∼1 year (Darnley et al 2014b(Darnley et al , for M31N 2008 up to 98 years (Schaefer 2010, with the shortest predicted recurrence period-albeit derived from incomplete observational data-being just six months ). The theoretical limits on the recurrence period of all novae may be as short as 50 days (Hillman et al 2015) or even 25 days 45 and as long as mega-years (see, for example, Starrfield et al 1985;Kovetz & Prialnik 1994;Yaron et al 2005). The shorter recurrence periods are driven by a combination of a high-mass WD and a high mass accretion rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main aspects of this picture have been contested by several authors. First, the existence of the stability strip has been questioned (e.g., Idan et al 2013;Starrfield 2014;Hillman et al 2015). In fact, no stable burning is reported in the Yaron et al (2005) tables either, although the ejected mass becomes zero at the highest mass-accretion rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen, our baseline model (Ṁ = 10 −7 M yr −1 ) predicts the maximal SN Ia rate of ≈5.0 × 10 −4 yr −1 . For the mass-accretion rate ofṀ = 5 × 10 −7 M yr −1 considered by Hillman et al (2015), the maximal SN Ia rate becomes ≈1.1 × 10 −4 yr −1 . Interestingly, for lower mass-accretion rates, observed population of novae could in principle explain a larger fraction of SNe Ia, and for very low rates,Ṁ < ∼ 10 −9 M yr −1 , and low WD temperature, the predicted rate is compatible with the observed value.…”
Section: E-09mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation