1987
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(87)90073-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations and predictions of jet diffusion flame behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is based on the assumption, following the theoretical findings of Escudier 17 and observational results of Becker et al, 18 that the effects of buoyancy forces on flame behavior are negligible. Observational assessments have shown that predictions of the Leahey and Schroeder model agree well with actual flame dimensions for a sour gas flare; 8,19 for methane, propane, ethylene, and butane flames observed in a wind tunnel; 20 and for a very large emergency flare. 21 One-to-one correlations between predicted and observed flame parameters were ~0.90.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model is based on the assumption, following the theoretical findings of Escudier 17 and observational results of Becker et al, 18 that the effects of buoyancy forces on flame behavior are negligible. Observational assessments have shown that predictions of the Leahey and Schroeder model agree well with actual flame dimensions for a sour gas flare; 8,19 for methane, propane, ethylene, and butane flames observed in a wind tunnel; 20 and for a very large emergency flare. 21 One-to-one correlations between predicted and observed flame parameters were ~0.90.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Equations for flame dimensions (downwind extent, area, volume) as presented by Leahey et al 8 and Leahey and Schroeder 19,20 are as follows:…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…f mix increases with increasing Uatm(Usc)s=0. To model f mix , different‐structured equations were fitted to the experimental data studied by Leahey and Schroeder . After comparing results obtained with the equations, the following exponential equation is found to yield the most accurate results: fmix=0.0802exptrue(normal2.7786Unormalatmfalse(Unormalscfalse)s=0true) Figures compare model results of the flame length and the flame angle with the measured data from Leahey and Schroeder .…”
Section: Preliminary Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flame angle is defined as the angle between the line connecting the flame base with the flame tip and the vertical. Data points that were deemed invalid by Leahey and Schroeder are indicated with a separate marker in the charts.…”
Section: Preliminary Model Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation