1995
DOI: 10.1086/175374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations in the Einstein-De Sitter cosmology: Dust statistics and limits of apparent homogeneity

Abstract: The two-point correlation function for the dust distribution in the unperturbed Einsteinde Sitter cosmological model is studied along the past light cone. It was found that the two-point correlation function seems unable to represent the theoretical distribution of dust along the backward null cone of this unperturbed model, which has already been determined in a previous paper as being apparently inhomogeneous at ranges usually considered as local. Such result was revisited in order to determine more precisel… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as they are using a flux limited sample, another (1 + z) factor must be considered when changing from bolometric to flux limited measures (Ellis 1971, p. 161 (2000) pointed out that locally the cold dark matter and fractal models predict the same behaviour for the power spectrum, a conclusion apparently shared by Cappi et al (1998). In addition, confirming Ribeiro's (1992bRibeiro's ( , 1995 conclusions, departures from the expected Euclidean results at small redshifts were also reported by Longair (1995, p. 398), and the starting point for his findings was the same as employed in here and by Ribeiro (1992bRibeiro ( , 1995: the use of source number count expression along the null cone.…”
Section: Some Common Misconceptionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, as they are using a flux limited sample, another (1 + z) factor must be considered when changing from bolometric to flux limited measures (Ellis 1971, p. 161 (2000) pointed out that locally the cold dark matter and fractal models predict the same behaviour for the power spectrum, a conclusion apparently shared by Cappi et al (1998). In addition, confirming Ribeiro's (1992bRibeiro's ( , 1995 conclusions, departures from the expected Euclidean results at small redshifts were also reported by Longair (1995, p. 398), and the starting point for his findings was the same as employed in here and by Ribeiro (1992bRibeiro ( , 1995: the use of source number count expression along the null cone.…”
Section: Some Common Misconceptionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…As the Hubble law is a distance-redshift law, derived from the first order expansions of the distances, it is clear that due to the non-linearity of the Einstein field equations, observational relations behave differently at different redshift depths. Consequently, while the linearity of the Hubble law is well preserved in the EdS model up to z ≈ 1 (Ribeiro 1995), a value implicitly assumed as the lower limit up to where relativistic effects could be safely ignored, the observational average densities constructed with d ℓ , d A , and z are strongly affected by relativistic effects at much lower redshift values. Then, while the zeroth order term vanishes in the distance-redshift relation, it is non-zero for the average density as plotted against redshift.…”
Section: An Example: the Einstein-de Sitter Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These quantities are useful in determining whether or not, and within what ranges, a spatially homogeneous cosmological model can or cannot be observationally homogeneous as well (Ribeiro 1995(Ribeiro , 2005Rangel Lemos & Ribeiro 2008). This is because these densities behave very differently depending on the distance measure used in their definitions -that is, they show a strong dependence on the cosmological distance adopted.…”
Section: Differential and Integral Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, from the analysis presented by Ribeiro (1995) it is clear that this is not a paradox, but just very different relativistic effects on the observables at the moderate redshift range (0.1 ≤ z < 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%