2014
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/1/19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of Comet Ison (C/2012 S1) From Lowell Observatory

Abstract: We observed the dynamically new sungrazing comet ISON (C/2012 S1) extensively at Lowell Observatory throughout 2013 in order to characterize its behavior prior to perihelion. ISON had "typical" abundances for an Oort Cloud comet. Its dust production, as measured by r Af , remained nearly constant during the apparition but its CN gas production increased by ∼50 ×. The minimum active area necessary to support observed water production rates exceeded the likely surface area of the nucleus and suggests a populatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 253 publications
(379 reference statements)
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming a system could be scaled up directly, a photometer on a 10 m class telescope would provide a factor of ∼ 100 improvement over existing facilities, e.g., the 1.1 m telescope at Lowell Observatory used by D. Schleicher. Knight and Schleicher (2015) detected CN in 30 min on comet C/2012 S1 ISON at r = 4.55 au with a production rate of Q(CN) ∼ 10 24 mol s −1 , near the limit for this instrument. This implies a hypothetical detection capability of 10 21 − 10 22 mol s −1 when accounting for the larger mirror, longer integrations, and an MBC at smaller r and .…”
Section: Ground-based Telescopesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Assuming a system could be scaled up directly, a photometer on a 10 m class telescope would provide a factor of ∼ 100 improvement over existing facilities, e.g., the 1.1 m telescope at Lowell Observatory used by D. Schleicher. Knight and Schleicher (2015) detected CN in 30 min on comet C/2012 S1 ISON at r = 4.55 au with a production rate of Q(CN) ∼ 10 24 mol s −1 , near the limit for this instrument. This implies a hypothetical detection capability of 10 21 − 10 22 mol s −1 when accounting for the larger mirror, longer integrations, and an MBC at smaller r and .…”
Section: Ground-based Telescopesmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…It was soon determined to be a sungrazing comet with a perihelion distance of 0.01244 AU (2.7 R ) to be reached on 2013 November 28. Due to an unprecedented lead time before perihelion, ISON became the subject of a broad and global observing campaign (http://www.isoncampaign.org/) with numerous ground-and space-based observatories making observations (e.g., Meech et al 2013;O'Rourke et al 2013;Bonev et al 2014;Cordiner et al 2014;Hines et al 2014;Shinnaka et al 2014;Knight and Schleicher 2015;Schmidt et al 2015). A fortuitous route through the inner solar system took the comet relatively close to Mars and Mercury, enabling observations from planetary spacecraft operating at those planets, before passing through the fields of view of the STEREO and SOHO solar observatories.…”
Section: C/2012 S1 Isonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As most observations leading to these size estimates occurred beyond Mercury's orbit, and Comet ISON was entering the inner solar system for the first time, the size estimates do not inform our specific understanding of near-Sun comets. Tentative measurements of ISON's rotation period seem to indicate that it was < 24 hours (Lamy et al 2014;Knight and Schleicher 2015;Santos-Sanz et al 2015). ISON is suspected to have broken up multiple times as it approached the Sun, evidenced by several changes in activity levels (Meech et al 2013;Opitom et al 2013).…”
Section: The Case Of C/2012 S1 Isonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained 30 consecutive 300 s observations, dithering every three frames, along with a single short image at the beginning (30 s) and at the end (3 s) of the sequence in which the stars were minimally trailed. All images have been processed by applying our standard image processing procedures (e.g., Knight & Schleicher 2015) to remove the bias and perform flat-field corrections; we used images of a diffusely illuminated spot on the inside of the dome to construct the flat-field images.…”
Section: Observations and Reductionsmentioning
confidence: 99%