1994
DOI: 10.1029/93jc02787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of Gulf Stream frontal eddies in the vicinity of Cape Hatteras

Abstract: The Frontal Eddy Dynamics (FRED) experiment was conducted offshore North Carolina between Cape Fear and Cape Hatteras from May through November 1987. Frontal eddies propagating northward along the North Carolina shelf break were observed during a 3-week intensive shipboard and aircraft survey phase, followed by a six-month (long-term) mooring and remote sensing monitoring phase. Using observations of a frontal eddy named Abbott from the intensive phase, it has been established that a frontal eddy cold dome can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frontal eddies are cyclonic eddies that regularly characterize the landward side of all western boundary currents, e.g., Gulf Stream [ Glenn and Ebbesmeyer , ] and the East Australian Current [ Everett et al ., ], and eastern boundary currents, e.g., California Current [ Kim et al ., ] and Benguela Current [ Shannon et al ., ]. These frontal eddies are formed as a result of velocity shear between the current and the continental shelf, or from meanders and instabilities in the boundary current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frontal eddies are cyclonic eddies that regularly characterize the landward side of all western boundary currents, e.g., Gulf Stream [ Glenn and Ebbesmeyer , ] and the East Australian Current [ Everett et al ., ], and eastern boundary currents, e.g., California Current [ Kim et al ., ] and Benguela Current [ Shannon et al ., ]. These frontal eddies are formed as a result of velocity shear between the current and the continental shelf, or from meanders and instabilities in the boundary current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-shelf increase in current magnitude is also likely a Gulf Stream effect, either through entrainment or cross-shelf sea surface slope effects. Gulf Stream filaments often overwash the entire shelf just south of Cape Hatteras [Glenn and Ebbesmeyer, 1994b]. Gulf Stream offshore location, separation angle, and path curvature at the Cape affect filament size and production, coastal sea level, and cross-shelf sea level slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hatteras,Glenn and Ebbesmeyer [1994b] noted enhanced shoreward progression of Gulf Stream filament waters when the main Gulf Stream front is located farther from shore. In fact, during the period of along-shelf divergence shown inFigure 18the Gulf Stream had moved offshore briefly, as indicated by the B4• pressure record (Cross spectra between nearshore transport convergence and forcing functions: (left) cross spectra between along-shelf transport convergence (B l-A1 transports) and CHLV2 along-shelf wind (solid line) and between along-shelf transport convergence and DSLN7 along-shelf wind (dashed line), (right) cross spectra between nearshore along-shelf transport convergence and PB4• (solid line), (top) magnitude squared coherence (drawn to the same scale), (middle) the phase lag in degrees, and (bottom) the phase lag in days, converted from degrees by 0aav -0aeg/(f360), where f is frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial intrusion began as a fairly typical interaction between continental shelf waters, exiting from the continental shelf, near Cape Hatteras and a Gulf Stream frontal eddy (Panel 1). Mesoscale eddies form frequently in this region and often draw coastal waters to them as they migrate past the Carolina Capes region [ Glenn and Ebbesmeyer , 1994]. Typically as the eddy progresses further downstream from Cape Hatteras the intrusion of coastal water is stretched into an elongated filament that propagates or is dragged along with the Stream, attached to the North Wall [ Churchill and Berger , 1998].…”
Section: Satellite Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%