2001
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-19-1641-2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of the cusp region under northward IMF

Abstract: Abstract. We present a comparative study of the cusp region using the EISCAT Svalbard Radars (ESR) and the Cluster spacecraft. We focus in this paper on 2 February 2001, over the time period from 07:30 UT to 12:00 UT when the oblique ESR antenna pointing northward at a low elevation recorded latitudinal motions of the cusp region in response to the IMF. Meanwhile, the Cluster satellites were flying over the EIS-CAT Svalbard Radar field-of-view around local magnetic noon. The spacecraft first flew near ESR, nor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The auroral display is then also sensitive to the pulsing nature of the reconnection process in the lobe (Sandholt et al, 1998c(Sandholt et al, , 2001. However, recent observations of the northward IMF cusp by incoherent scatter radars showed no periodic or even quasi-periodic variations in the plasma parameters (Pitout et al, 2001). This is probably due to the weak sunward plasma convection velocity associated with lobe reconnection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The auroral display is then also sensitive to the pulsing nature of the reconnection process in the lobe (Sandholt et al, 1998c(Sandholt et al, , 2001. However, recent observations of the northward IMF cusp by incoherent scatter radars showed no periodic or even quasi-periodic variations in the plasma parameters (Pitout et al, 2001). This is probably due to the weak sunward plasma convection velocity associated with lobe reconnection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…4), is much greater than that outside. However, the density (<10.0 cm −3 ) is lower than average (Pitout et al, 2001). That may be because the crossing is through the outer cusp.…”
Section: Single-point Observationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The data have also revealed the existence of a double cusp structure, and field-aligned currents and plasma instabilities in the cusp (e.g. Bosqued et al, 2001;Krauklis et al, 2001;Gurnett et al, 2001;Taylor et al, 2001;Decreau et al, 2001;Opgenoorth et al, 2001;Pitout et al, 2001;Réme et al, 2001;Cornilleau et al, 2003). Recently, Cargill et al (2005) presented a review of Cluster at the magnetospheric cusps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its simplest form, an adiaroic boundary separates the polar regime on open magnetic field lines from the lower-latitude viscous regime on closed field lines, across which plasma cannot enter or leave the polar cap. The boundary between the two regimes has been identified at small IMF clock angles in ion flow measurements by the EISCAT Svalbard radar (ESR) by comparison with the equatorward boundary of redline cusp emission (Pryse et al, 2000b), and it was also a feature of the ESR flow observations of Pitout et al (2001) under B z positive but with variable clock angle. Milan et al (2003) used low level UV aurora in the polar cap, co-located with magnetosheath precipitation, to locate the open/closed magnetic field line boundary under northward IMF, identifying the boundary with the equatorward edge of the emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%