2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005jd006879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations of the relationship between sprite morphology and in‐cloud lightning processes

Abstract: [1] During a thunderstorm on 23 July 2003, 15 sprites were captured by a LLTV camera mounted at the observatory on Pic du Midi in the French Pyrénées. Simultaneous observations of cloud-to-ground (CG) and intracloud (IC) lightning activity from two independent lightning detection systems and a broadband ELF/VLF receiver allow a detailed study of the relationship between electrical activity in a thunderstorm and the sprites generated in the mesosphere above. Results suggest that positive CG and IC lightning dif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
95
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2b), indicating that the two +CGs may locate in particle mixing region and the thunderstorm structures in these regions are very complex. Although the +CG1 and +CG2 locations are significantly separated, the positive charge reservoirs (from which the charge transferred to the ground) may be close to each other, and the in-cloud discharge may connect the two reservoirs together and play a role in sprite production (Ohkubo et al 2005;Van der Velde et al 2006;Marshall et al 2007;Asano et al 2009;Lu et al 2013;Lyu et al 2015). In this case, the two +CGs for the 00:23 sprite may be one lightning flash but with different locations (merely the distance between the ground striking points of the two strokes is larger than that of the grouping algorithm usually used for combing different return strokes into one flash).…”
Section: ° (A) -(H) Roi (Region Of Interest)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2b), indicating that the two +CGs may locate in particle mixing region and the thunderstorm structures in these regions are very complex. Although the +CG1 and +CG2 locations are significantly separated, the positive charge reservoirs (from which the charge transferred to the ground) may be close to each other, and the in-cloud discharge may connect the two reservoirs together and play a role in sprite production (Ohkubo et al 2005;Van der Velde et al 2006;Marshall et al 2007;Asano et al 2009;Lu et al 2013;Lyu et al 2015). In this case, the two +CGs for the 00:23 sprite may be one lightning flash but with different locations (merely the distance between the ground striking points of the two strokes is larger than that of the grouping algorithm usually used for combing different return strokes into one flash).…”
Section: ° (A) -(H) Roi (Region Of Interest)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies also show that in-cloud (IC) sprite-producing stroke activity could play a role in sprite formation (Ohkubo et al 2005; Van der Velde et al 2006;Marshall et al 2007;Asano et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, after the SP+CG stroke, the sprite discharge develops as a streamer as a result of the strong transient electrostatic field that exceeds the threshold for dielectric breakdown in the middle atmosphere, generally around 70 km [15]. The time delay after the lightning stroke ranges from a few ms to several tens of ms [13,16]; the time delay depends on the characteristics of the SP+CG stroke, especially in terms of CMC, iCMC and current waveforms [17]. It can reach a few tens of ms after a long lightning continuing current following the stroke [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite that the electrical structure of a typical thundercloud is rather a stratiform, the most part of positive charges tend to pile up at the upper portion of the thundercloud, whereas most of negative charges predominantly accumulate at its bottom Lyons, 2006;Krehbiel et al, 2008;. The simplest model of the spatial charge separation in the thundercloud is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%