1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01197921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on successive infestations of the rabbit host by the ticksRhipicephalus appendiculatus andR. zambeziensis (Acari: Ixodidae)

Abstract: Successive infestation of the rabbit host by instars of the brown ear tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus resulted in a progressive decline in engorgement and egg weights of adult instars and a reduction in percentage recovery of nymphs and larvae. Repetitive infestation with adults and larvae resulted in increased skin hypersensitivity reactions at the attachment site. Successive infestation with R. zambeziensis caused a more significant decline in engorgement and egg weights of adults than for R. appendiculatu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not clear why there was no further decline in the mean engorgement weight of females of H. marginatum rufipes during the third infestation of the treatment group. Similar anomalous observations in which the mean engorgement weight recovered following a decline were made by Fivas and Norval (1989) and Dipeolu et al (1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, it is not clear why there was no further decline in the mean engorgement weight of females of H. marginatum rufipes during the third infestation of the treatment group. Similar anomalous observations in which the mean engorgement weight recovered following a decline were made by Fivas and Norval (1989) and Dipeolu et al (1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Host immunity can on one hand cause an almost complete blocking of tick feeding, as for example occurs in Dermacentorandersoni fed on guinea pigs (McTier etal., 1981)and/?. zambeziensis fed on rabbits (Fivaz and Norval, 1989), and on the other hand may have little or no effect on tick feeding, as occurs in A. hebraeum and A. variegatum. Other tick species that are able to feed repeatedly on the same hosts without the development of resistance are Rhipicephalus sanguineus on dogs (Theis and Budwiser, 1974),Ixodestriangulicepson long-tailed field mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) (Randolph, 1979) and Haemaphysalis leporispalustris fed on the In A. hebraeum and probably A. variegatum the lack of direct hosteffects on tick feeding areovercome by the combined effects of grooming and tick avoidance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous report (Fivaz and Norval, 1989), which compared the engorgement weights and oviposition rate of R. zambeziensis and R. appendiculatus following repeated infestations of rabbits, it was apparent that the rabbit host manifested a stronger resistance against R. zambeziensis than against R. appendiculatus. The mean engorgement weight of replete adult females of R. zambeziensis was 14-fold lower after this infestation compared with a 2-fold reduction recorded in R. appendiculatus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cross-resistance has been demonstrated between R. zambeziensis and R. appendiculatus (Fivaz and Norval, 1989 (Norval, 1978), and therefore it would have been unlikely that R. zambeziensis would have shown cross-resistance against A. hebraeum. It is not clear why A. hebraeum fails to induce host resistance m the rabbit, though we could speculate that the salivary secretions are not sufficiently immunogenic in the rabbit host, or they may be immunosuppressive, as has been demonstrated in other tick species (Wikel, 1982;Fivaz, 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation