2019
DOI: 10.1111/1747-0080.12537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations on the relationship between the dietetic objective structured clinical examination and placement outcome

Abstract: Aim Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) are used extensively in medical education to prepare students for the clinical setting. Their use in dietetic education is still relatively new, and relationships to placement outcomes are unknown. The aim of this study was to explore 11 years of OSCE and placement data to answer the following questions: Does the OSCE predict dietetic placement outcome? and, What are the student perceptions of the benefits of OSCE in preparation for practice? Methods Data … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining 18 potential articles underwent full text review and were assessed against the eligibility criteria, resulting in 14 included articles describing dietetics education or credentialing research. Of these studies, three focused on competency standards, 23 , 24 , 25 four on assessment, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 five on curriculum, 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 and two on continuing education 35 , 36 (Table 2 and Figure S1 ). These characteristics were reviewed by the authors with the aim of identifying one published example from scientific, 28 interpretive 31 and critical 24 approaches that could best illustrate the stated philosophy and be critiqued for internal coherence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The remaining 18 potential articles underwent full text review and were assessed against the eligibility criteria, resulting in 14 included articles describing dietetics education or credentialing research. Of these studies, three focused on competency standards, 23 , 24 , 25 four on assessment, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 five on curriculum, 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 and two on continuing education 35 , 36 (Table 2 and Figure S1 ). These characteristics were reviewed by the authors with the aim of identifying one published example from scientific, 28 interpretive 31 and critical 24 approaches that could best illustrate the stated philosophy and be critiqued for internal coherence.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these studies, three focused on competency standards, 23 , 24 , 25 four on assessment, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 five on curriculum, 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 and two on continuing education 35 , 36 (Table 2 and Figure S1 ). These characteristics were reviewed by the authors with the aim of identifying one published example from scientific, 28 interpretive 31 and critical 24 approaches that could best illustrate the stated philosophy and be critiqued for internal coherence. The selected papers are summarised in Table 2 and discussed critically below; initially presenting a summary of their study aims and approaches and then critiquing their internal coherence in line with their approaches.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30 There was also increased confidence in their skill level, although this was not related to an objective measure of skill or subsequent performance. Although performance at OSCEs has been related to placement outcome, 46 details on the specific communication skills assessed were not provided.…”
Section: Pre-registration Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OSCEs were primarily introduced to medical education as a means of assessing the skills and ability of surgical students, rather than a test of factual information, (Cuschieri et al, 1979). The use of an OSCE is often perceived as having the resilience to prepare students for practice, with the robust use of this simulated approach is thought to closely link theory to practice (Parkin and Collinson, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%