The saline preference of acute and chronic desalivated rats was studied in two strains of rats. Desalivated and sham-operated rats were tested in the two-bottle situation where their consumption of 0.9% NaCI and water was measured daily. Experiment 1 dealt with Long-Evans hooded rats which were tested for 20 consecutive days immediately after the operation. Experiment 2 dealth with BD IX agouti Norway rats which were tested for 10 consecutive days 140 days after the operation. The results of both experiments indicated that desalivated rats show greater saline preference than control rats during most of the initial 10 test sessions.In an extensive monograph on the effects of desalivation on the rat's food and water intake, Vance (1965) concluded that the presence or absence of saliva is very important in regulating the amount of NaCI a rat will ingest. This conclusion was drawn from the results of an experiment comparing sodium preference among the desalivates. Vance observed an exaggerated NaCI preference among desalivated rats that was evident mainly during the immediate postoperative period. About 30 days after the operation, the group differences almost disappeared. Vance did not assess the statistical significance of his results, an omission due in part to the small N of his groups (six control and four desalivated animals). Only a single reading was taken over a 48-h period of a number of NaCI solutions varying in concentration. We feel that daily readings of the animal's intake over a substantial period of time is preferable to the "one-shot" test.We feel that it is necessary to validate Vance's (1965) results under conditions more' amenable to statistical analysis. The present experiment was designed to compare the isotonic saline intake of desalivated and sham-operated rats over a number of days once the operation was completed. Aside from repeating the observations over a number of sessions, we also incorporated a number of other This research was aided in part by a grant from the National Research Council of Canada, 67'{)247, to R. Wong, and by one from the U.B.C. Research Committee to L. Kraintz . We thank Ken Shimizu for his help in collecting the data for Experiment I and Beverly Clark for her help in collecting the data for Experiment 2 and in analyzing the data of both experiments .procedural changes that made our design more sensitive than the one used by Vance. His method of comparing the volume of saline consumed by the groups can lead to errors due to individual variation in total fluid consumption within and between groups. A saline preference score expressed as percentage of fluid volume obviates this problem of variability.We tested the animals with isotonic saline mainly because maximal differences between desalivates and controls occurred with this solution. With solutions of lower and higher tonicity, differences appear to be less obvious in Vance's rats. An inspection of the preference-aversion function of the two groups' saline intake suggests minimal differences when 0.5% and 2.0070 N...