2020
DOI: 10.1086/710544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations, Simulations, and Reasoning in Astrophysics

Abstract: Astrophysics faces methodological challenges as a result of being a predominantly observation-based science without access to traditional experiments. In light of these challenges, astrophysicists frequently rely on computer simulations. Using collisional ring galaxies as a case study, I argue that computer simulations play three roles in reasoning in astrophysics: (1) hypothesis testing, (2) exploring possibility space, and (3) amplifying observations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See, e.g., the detailed investigation on the relation between models and simulations proposed by Winsberg (2018). A recent philosophical discussion of the role of computer simulations in astrophysics is provided by Jacquart (2020).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…See, e.g., the detailed investigation on the relation between models and simulations proposed by Winsberg (2018). A recent philosophical discussion of the role of computer simulations in astrophysics is provided by Jacquart (2020).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the functions and meaning of modeling and simulations in astrophysics have been objects of extensive philosophical study, especially in the last decade (e.g., Vanderburgh, 2003Vanderburgh, , 2014Anderl, 2018;Massimi, 2018;Smeenk & Gallagher, 2020;Gueguen, 2020;Jacquart, 2020Jacquart, , 2021. Here, we take a slightly different direction with respect to this literature, by considering the issue of astrophysical modeling in the framework of the current debate on modal modeling in science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond this, even when the interest does not lie in the reconstruction of token events but in finding long-term regularities, many studies are of a historical nature. Our observation is only a “snapshot” of the cosmic processes that last for billions of years (Jacquart 2022). As it is unlikely that we could observe those processes or test a prediction in the far future, the relatively more accessible route is to observe fossils of such processes and make inferences backward.…”
Section: Astronomy and Historical Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could argue that if it were possible to perform experiments that are in effect impracticable, then scientists would have access to more, better data. To borrow the case that Jacquart (2020) discusses, if astrophysicists could physically create head-on collisions between actual compact galaxies and disk galaxies under various conditions, they might learn more about the formation and evolution of ring galaxies than they can without physically smashing galaxies into one another. Performing physically impossible experiments would deliver more results than mere observation, thereby making experiment epistemically superior to observation, in principle.…”
Section: Cp Arguments For the Epistemic Superiority Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%