2008
DOI: 10.1175/2007bams2463.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OBSERVATIONS: Upper-Air Moisture Data Void Discovered . . . and Partially Rectified

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most early radiosonde hygrometers were considered unreliable under such cold conditions (Remsberg , and it was a standard practice until 1993 for U.S. stations to report humidity measurements as missing when T was below 2408C. This practice may have continued until at least 2006 at more than 200 radiosonde stations in South America, Australia, India, China, and other countries, even though some modern hygrometers are able to measure RH when T is as low as 21008C (Clough and Padovani 2008). To minimize the effect of this practice, McCarthy et al (2009) first rejected all the humidity reports when T , 2408C in .5% of a season's observations, and then they used the linear regression coefficients between monthly-mean T and RH, and between monthly-mean T and the natural logarithm of q in the 1995-2003 observations to estimate the mean RH and q of the missing (or rejected) observations from the mean of the associated T for all years.…”
Section: Known Discontinuities In Radiosonde Humidity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most early radiosonde hygrometers were considered unreliable under such cold conditions (Remsberg , and it was a standard practice until 1993 for U.S. stations to report humidity measurements as missing when T was below 2408C. This practice may have continued until at least 2006 at more than 200 radiosonde stations in South America, Australia, India, China, and other countries, even though some modern hygrometers are able to measure RH when T is as low as 21008C (Clough and Padovani 2008). To minimize the effect of this practice, McCarthy et al (2009) first rejected all the humidity reports when T , 2408C in .5% of a season's observations, and then they used the linear regression coefficients between monthly-mean T and RH, and between monthly-mean T and the natural logarithm of q in the 1995-2003 observations to estimate the mean RH and q of the missing (or rejected) observations from the mean of the associated T for all years.…”
Section: Known Discontinuities In Radiosonde Humidity Datamentioning
confidence: 99%