2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observed differences of triple-frequency radar signatures between snowflakes in stratiform and convective clouds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the results from Figure to past studies, the majority (63%) of OLYMPEX observations being found within the spheroidal‐behavior region of the DFR plane (Figures a and b) is consistent with prior airborne radar observations (Kulie et al, ) and spaceborne radar observations (Yin et al, ). This is expected when the particles in the PSD are scattering in the Rayleigh regime at all three frequencies (DFR Ku − Ka ≅ DFR Ka − W ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Comparing the results from Figure to past studies, the majority (63%) of OLYMPEX observations being found within the spheroidal‐behavior region of the DFR plane (Figures a and b) is consistent with prior airborne radar observations (Kulie et al, ) and spaceborne radar observations (Yin et al, ). This is expected when the particles in the PSD are scattering in the Rayleigh regime at all three frequencies (DFR Ku − Ka ≅ DFR Ka − W ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The selected frequencies are within ±1 GHz of X-, Ku-, Ka-, and W-band frequencies commonly used for the analysis of snowfall triple-frequency radar signatures (Leinonen et al, 2012;Kulie et al, 2014;Kneifel et al, 2015Kneifel et al, , 2016Yin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Snowfall Triple-frequency Radar Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 covers a large part of all observed triple-frequency sig-natures in snowfall radar reflectivity measurements by Kulie et al (2014), Kneifel et al (2015), and Yin et al (2017). This modeled range also includes many of the triple-frequency radar signatures that Stein et al (2015) observed in their radar reflectivity measurements at 3, 35, and 94 GHz and modeled based on synthetic aggregate snowflakes generated according to W04.…”
Section: Snowfall Triple-frequency Radar Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability is a source of significant uncertainty in radar retrievals. Nevertheless, dual-frequency methods have proved useful for snow retrievals (Hogan et al, 2000;Liao et al, 2005;Matrosov, 1993Matrosov, , 1998.Recently, experimental, modeling and theoretical studies have established that radars using three different frequencies can convey information about the snowflake density, in addition to the size (e.g Kneifel et al, 2011;Kulie et al, 2014;Leinonen et al, 2012;Stein et al, 2015;Yin et al, 2017). This can be understood in terms of the relationship between the frequency dependence of radar reflectivity, and the spatial correlation of the mass distribution of the snowflake (Leinonen et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%