Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics III 2015
DOI: 10.1201/b18442-98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observed variations of monopile foundation stiffness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the evolution of the OWT dynamics from pre-storm to post-consolidation stages, it is concluded that the monopile stiffness degradation induced by even strong storm is not expected to be permanent. This inference confirms the observations from previous fields measurements, for instance from those reported by (Kallehave et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Based on the evolution of the OWT dynamics from pre-storm to post-consolidation stages, it is concluded that the monopile stiffness degradation induced by even strong storm is not expected to be permanent. This inference confirms the observations from previous fields measurements, for instance from those reported by (Kallehave et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The first natural frequency f 0 was estimated by post-processing acceleration signals recorded at the rotor-nacelle-assembly (RNA). Despite the differences in OWT size, soil conditions and environmental loads, it is still interesting to compare the f 0 -drops recorded by Kallehave et al (2015b) to the corresponding drops predicted in this study for an 8 MW wind turbine in stiff sand (D r = 80%). In particular, the experimental data associated with wind speeds of about 24 m/s and 47 m/s (see red and blue arrows in Figure 19a) are considered in the comparison.…”
Section: Transient Drops In Natural Frequencymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Only a few literature studies investigated the dynamics of OWTs based on field monitoring and observations related to the geotechnical performance of the foundation. A notable example is the work by Kallehave et al (2015b), in which the performance of a 2.3 MW OWT in dense to very dense sand is discussed after a monitoring period of 2.5 years. The OWT considered was founded on a monopile having length 18.4 m and diameter 3.9 m, and experienced only one strong storm during the monitoring period -see gray-shaded are in Figure 19a.…”
Section: Transient Drops In Natural Frequencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full-scale measurements of monopile-based OWTs also confirm the non-linear hysteretic foundation response. Kallehave et al (2015) observed that the measured natural frequency of monopile-based OWTs decreased with increasing wind speeds and related it to increasing displacement levels. The same conclusion was reached by Damgaard et al (2013) when analysing the reduction in natural frequency with increasing acceleration levels.…”
Section: Observed Foundation Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 95%