2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer Agreement of Spine Stenosis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Patients With Cervical Spine Myelopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings were in agreement with results of comparable studies 13,[19][20][21][22] in which intraobserver agreement was generally consistently higher than interobserver agreement. Thus, although each observer was very consistent in interpreting MRI studies, some variability existed between observers despite use of standardized definitions and observer expertise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These findings were in agreement with results of comparable studies 13,[19][20][21][22] in which intraobserver agreement was generally consistently higher than interobserver agreement. Thus, although each observer was very consistent in interpreting MRI studies, some variability existed between observers despite use of standardized definitions and observer expertise.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Interobserver studies of C-spine MR imaging have reported a wide range of agreement for detection of degenerative disease on T2-FSE or T2-SPACE. [15][16][17][18] None, however, have reported interobserver agreement for T2-FSE visualization of Cspine anatomic structures. Our interobserver agreement results may represent the first description of visualization and detection differences of C-spine MR imaging anatomy on T2-FSE between musculoskeletal radiologists and neuroradiologists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study which investigated the classification of structural changes in whiplash injuries 26 , the pair-wise interobserver agreement (weighted kappa) was found to be fair to moderate (0.31-0.54) and Cook et al found only poor agreement (Ƙ =-0.12 -0.51) when measuring the interobserver variability in cervical stenosis. 27 Kuijper et al found Kappa scores, for evaluation of herniated discs, spondylotic foramen stenosis and the presence of root compression, was 0.59, 0.63 and 0.67, respectively, in MRI evaluation of patients with cervical radiculopathy 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%