2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2017.0510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer‐based event‐triggered control for consensus of general linear MASs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this difficulty, the property of the positive definite matrix W L ¯ 1 + L ¯ 1 T W is used, and two new Lyapunov functions (15) and (29) are proposed for solving the static consensus protocol design and fully distributed consensus protocol design, respectively, in this paper. Remark 4 It is interesting to note that, different from the results presented in [42], which requires that a i 0 > 0 if the leader is a neighbour of the i th agent, the communication weight a i 0 considered in this paper is allowed to be non‐zero when there exists an edge from the leader to the i th agent, which is more reasonable in the framework of signed digraph. Remark 5 In this paper, we consider bipartite tracking consensus of linear multi‐agent systems with a dynamic leader under signed digraph. It is worth noting that the bipartite containment problem with multiple leaders has been investigated in [49], and the consensus problem via event‐triggered strategy has received considerable attention [50, 51]. On the other hand, it is challenging to tackle the bipartite consensus problem when the signed digraph is structurally unbalanced, since by Lemmas 1 and 2 there is not an appropriate matrix S such that S A S has all non‐negative entries and L ¯ 1 is not a non‐singular M ‐matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To overcome this difficulty, the property of the positive definite matrix W L ¯ 1 + L ¯ 1 T W is used, and two new Lyapunov functions (15) and (29) are proposed for solving the static consensus protocol design and fully distributed consensus protocol design, respectively, in this paper. Remark 4 It is interesting to note that, different from the results presented in [42], which requires that a i 0 > 0 if the leader is a neighbour of the i th agent, the communication weight a i 0 considered in this paper is allowed to be non‐zero when there exists an edge from the leader to the i th agent, which is more reasonable in the framework of signed digraph. Remark 5 In this paper, we consider bipartite tracking consensus of linear multi‐agent systems with a dynamic leader under signed digraph. It is worth noting that the bipartite containment problem with multiple leaders has been investigated in [49], and the consensus problem via event‐triggered strategy has received considerable attention [50, 51]. On the other hand, it is challenging to tackle the bipartite consensus problem when the signed digraph is structurally unbalanced, since by Lemmas 1 and 2 there is not an appropriate matrix S such that S A S has all non‐negative entries and L ¯ 1 is not a non‐singular M ‐matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is challenging to tackle the bipartite consensus problem when the signed digraph is structurally unbalanced, since by Lemmas 1 and 2 there is not an appropriate matrix S such that S A S has all non‐negative entries and L ¯ 1 is not a non‐singular M ‐matrix. Therefore, by employing the ideas presented in [49–51], it is interesting to further consider the extension of the proposed results to bipartite containment control problem and bipartite consensus problem via event‐triggered strategy when the signed digraph is structurally unbalanced, in the future work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [23], the integral action was incorporated into the observer controller to improve the formation tracking and observation performance. To guarantee the consensus of general linear multi-robot systems, observer-based event-triggered approach was presented by Wang et al [24]. Wen et al [25] developed the distributed controller based on a reduced-order state observer to track the high-dimensional leader robot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the implementation of distributed consensus algorithms, the continuous communication between agents may lead to large data transmission load and the waste of power resources. As an effective method to reduce the communication traffic, eventtriggered control has drawn more and more attention [19][20][21][22][23]. Tremendous progress has been made in event-triggered consensus control of non-linear multi-agent systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%