1978
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.41.7.603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma.

Abstract: SUMMARY Head-injured patients were examined by a number of observers whose assessments were compared. Considerable discrepancies occurred when overall "levels" of consciousness and coma were used, and also with some terms which are in common use. More consistent assessments were obtained by employing the "Glasgow Coma Scale," which describes eye opening, verbal behaviour, and motor responsiveness. Nurses and general surgeons were as consistent as neurosurgeons when using this scale, and it was relatively resis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
81
0
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, it is plausible that many of the overdoses were mixed ingestions; therefore, it is difficult to determine the expected response to naloxone in mixed co-ingestions of different toxins. Finally, prehospital provider training for objective criteria such as respiratory rate and GCS is quite uniform and the inter-rater reliability is exceedingly high [21,22]. For these reasons, we believe the use of EAR in this study was appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, it is plausible that many of the overdoses were mixed ingestions; therefore, it is difficult to determine the expected response to naloxone in mixed co-ingestions of different toxins. Finally, prehospital provider training for objective criteria such as respiratory rate and GCS is quite uniform and the inter-rater reliability is exceedingly high [21,22]. For these reasons, we believe the use of EAR in this study was appropriate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Treatment response was known at the time of documentation and may have influenced what was recorded. There was no possibility of independent verification to the accuracy of objective measures like GCS scores; however, the inter-rater reliability for GCS has previously been shown to be exceedingly high [21,22]. Similarly, the accurate documentation of vital signs by EMS providers in this study may have been outweighed by the need for urgent administration of naloxone to patients with impending respiratory arrest; however, the training of paramedics is fairly uniform throughout the region and the clinical information sought did not require additional training to obtain reliably.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The interobserver agreement in the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale has been proved good, as has the agreement between nurses and physicians. 22 It is sobering that in the subsequent 4 years the rational approach embodied by the WFNS scale has not perceptibly replaced the traditional scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We stratified randomization for country and total ICH score (0, 1, 2, Ͼ3) 23 at admission, which is based on location and size of the hematoma, involvement of ventricles, age, and the Glasgow Coma Scale. 24 The Glasgow Coma Scale is not validated for use specifically in stroke patients, but indicates the level of consciousness in brain injured patients. The study drug was prepared for infusion to a final concentration of 15 mg/mL in 0.9% saline, with NXY-059 and placebo (0.9% saline) in vials of identical appearance.…”
Section: Study Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%