1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81847-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observer variation in pattern type and extent of disease in fibrosing alveolitis on thin section computed tomography and chest radiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
1
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
67
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the radiological criteria for the diagnosis of UIP on HRCT were not mentioned in this latter study, it is not possible to explain the difference between their kw and those of MACDONALD et al [9], FLAHERTY et al [3] and the present study. Other studies [8,10,19,20], however, have found a higher level of agreement, but their study populations and the purposes for which observer variability were calculated differed significantly from those of the present study (table 4). AZIZ et al [21] found an observer agreement of 0.48 on the first-choice diagnosis in a cohort of 131 patients with diffuse parenchymal lung disease; the kw in the IPF cohort was 0.50.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the radiological criteria for the diagnosis of UIP on HRCT were not mentioned in this latter study, it is not possible to explain the difference between their kw and those of MACDONALD et al [9], FLAHERTY et al [3] and the present study. Other studies [8,10,19,20], however, have found a higher level of agreement, but their study populations and the purposes for which observer variability were calculated differed significantly from those of the present study (table 4). AZIZ et al [21] found an observer agreement of 0.48 on the first-choice diagnosis in a cohort of 131 patients with diffuse parenchymal lung disease; the kw in the IPF cohort was 0.50.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Various studies have calculated the accuracy of thoracic HRCT in fibrotic lung diseases [5][6][7], evaluated interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of different thoracic HRCT patterns (e.g. ground-glass and reticular pattern) [8,9] in patients with biopsy-proven nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) or UIP [3], or in different forms of interstitial lung disease [10,11]. Studies on interobserver agreement amongst pathologists are sparse [12], and only one study with a multicentric prospective design has addressed the issue of diagnostic accuracy in UIP in relation to both radiologist and pathologist [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since many treatable disorders with more favorable prognoses may mimic IPF, a lung biopsy is essential in patients clinically suspected to have IPF. However, recent retrospective studies have shown HRCT to be quite specific at making a diagnosis, without the need for an open lung biopsy (5,6,(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). The aim of this study was to determine the value of clinical and radiological findings in diagnosis IPF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An initial overall analysis of the HRCT (without considering cut-off levels) was conducted, in search of the following findings: nodules, ground-glass opacities, reticular abnormality, honeycombing (cysts < 3 mm and > 3 mm), traction bronchiectasis, air trapping areas and emphysema. (18,19) Subsequently, the HRCT was evaluated as to the extent and intensity of interstitial lung involvement, considering five cut-off levels: 1) origin of major vessels; 2) aortic arch level; 3) carina; 4) confluence of pulmonary veins; and 5) 1 cm above the right diaphragm. (6,(19)(20)(21) Using a semiquantitative evaluation system, each of these levels (right and left, separately, totaling 10 levels) was analyzed as to the following aspects:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%