2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12052-016-0059-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observing populations and testing predictions about genetic drift in a computer simulation improves college students’ conceptual understanding

Abstract: Background: Evolution is a difficult subject for students, with well-documented confusion about natural selection, tree thinking, and genetic drift among other topics. Here we investigate the effect of a simulation-based module about the conservation of black-footed ferrets, a module designed with pedagogical approaches that have been demonstrated to be effective, for teaching genetic drift. We compared performance on the Genetic Drift Inventory (GeDI) of students who completed the module and students who were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with studies showing nonscientific ideas persist (e.g., Price et al, 2016), not all changes in student responses were consistent with a more expert-like explanation. We found that students added the Developing idea of Excretion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Consistent with studies showing nonscientific ideas persist (e.g., Price et al, 2016), not all changes in student responses were consistent with a more expert-like explanation. We found that students added the Developing idea of Excretion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…For example, the award-winning software Avida-ED, has been effectively used to introduce evolutionary ideas to freshmen students via hypothesis testing (Abi Abdallah et al 2020), understand the role of low-impact mutations in evolution (Nelson and Sanford 2011), and to test the robustness of genetic drift in small populations (Labar and Adami 2017). Nonetheless, it should not be forgotten than different students can master the same topic using different paths (Price et al 2016), and that different classroom settings might be more suitable for distinct teaching methods. Simply put, there is no 'fit all' teaching strategy that can be universally implemented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have created approaches aimed to identify student misconceptions regarding genetic drift (Andrews et al 2012;Price et al 2014), and study activities and software have been developed, tested, and made publicly available (Price et al 2016;Revell 2019;Staub 2002). These serve as indicators that the knowledge gap regarding genetic drift instruction is being addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an open-response assessment in the previous study by Abraham et al (2009), this was the most commonly expressed misconception on both the pre and post-test. This is not surprising given that processes involving randomness are difficult for students to understand (Ferrari and Chi 1998;Meir et al 2007;Garvin-Doxas and Klymkowsky 2008;Price et al 2016).…”
Section: Adaptive Mutation Misconceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%