2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11080981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observing System Experiments with an Arctic Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model

Abstract: In the Arctic, weather forecasting is one element of risk mitigation, helping operators to have knowledge on weather-related risk in advance through forecasting capabilities at time ranges from a few hours to days ahead. The operational numerical weather prediction is an initial value problem where the forecast quality depends both on the quality of the forecast model itself and on the quality of the specified initial state. The initial states are regularly updated using environmental observations through data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a case study with a mesoscale low in the Barents Sea the new initial conditions improve the location of the mesoscale low by 140 km. Similar runs with initial surface conditions from AROME-Arctic in MF-AROME runs reduce the MF-AROME T2 errors to the same level as AROME-Arctic and highlight the importance of surface assimilation as also shown in Randriamampianina et al (2019) The forecast climatologies also reveal that there are differences that are not evaluated in this study due to the sparseness of observations. This includes differences over areas covered by sea ice (e.g., T2, TCC, and pre-cip24), ocean areas (TCC, precip24), and inland and mountain areas at Svalbard (e.g., WS10 and T2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For a case study with a mesoscale low in the Barents Sea the new initial conditions improve the location of the mesoscale low by 140 km. Similar runs with initial surface conditions from AROME-Arctic in MF-AROME runs reduce the MF-AROME T2 errors to the same level as AROME-Arctic and highlight the importance of surface assimilation as also shown in Randriamampianina et al (2019) The forecast climatologies also reveal that there are differences that are not evaluated in this study due to the sparseness of observations. This includes differences over areas covered by sea ice (e.g., T2, TCC, and pre-cip24), ocean areas (TCC, precip24), and inland and mountain areas at Svalbard (e.g., WS10 and T2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, the whole configuration and more details of the DA system are described by Randriamampianina et al . (2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the coverage of observations from polar‐orbiting satellites is one issue and the temporal availability of the remote‐sensing data is another in the verification procedure. Therefore, the verification against radiosonde observations was performed using only eight radiosondes, which are very well‐distributed inside the NWP model domain (Randriamampianina et al ., 2019). Common error statistics – the root mean square error (RMSE) and normalised differences in RMSE – are calculated by comparison of the model data to radiosondes and comparing different experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In East Africa in general and in Ethiopia in particular, droughts have recurred in the last decades and is a major natural disaster that contributes to food insecurity and poverty [37][38][39]. In Ethiopia, the availability of drought has increased due to climate change and will cause a decline in water and agricultural production [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%