2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00173-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obsessive–compulsive disorder subtypes: an attempted replication and extension of a symptom-based taxonomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
79
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
79
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…While McKay et al (2006) was likely underpowered (n = 137), Stewart et al (2007) (n = 231) still derived somewhat different factors than previous adult category-level analyses, including a factor in which contamination/cleaning loaded with the aggressive and somatic categories. Despite similarities to adult cluster analyses of OCD symptoms (Calamari et al, 1999(Calamari et al, , 2004, Ivarsson and Valderhaug (2006) (n = 213) noted important differences in their child/adolescent cluster analysis such as the absence of subgroups for hoarding and symmetry/ordering. The authors speculated that these discrepancies might be due to developmental differences in OCD phenomenology and clinical course in children/adolescents as compared with adults (Jaisoorya et al, 2003;Stewart et al, 2004).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…While McKay et al (2006) was likely underpowered (n = 137), Stewart et al (2007) (n = 231) still derived somewhat different factors than previous adult category-level analyses, including a factor in which contamination/cleaning loaded with the aggressive and somatic categories. Despite similarities to adult cluster analyses of OCD symptoms (Calamari et al, 1999(Calamari et al, , 2004, Ivarsson and Valderhaug (2006) (n = 213) noted important differences in their child/adolescent cluster analysis such as the absence of subgroups for hoarding and symmetry/ordering. The authors speculated that these discrepancies might be due to developmental differences in OCD phenomenology and clinical course in children/adolescents as compared with adults (Jaisoorya et al, 2003;Stewart et al, 2004).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Furthermore, the fact that many patients with compulsive hoarding report little distress or recognition of the problem contrasts with the typical clinical presentation of OCD (therefore, hoarding diagnoses are frequently based on obvious impairment, rather than self-reported distress). Factor and cluster analyses indicate that hoarding consistently emerges as a distinct symptom type, although in two studies hoarding combined with symmetry/ordering to form a separate subgroup (see Calamari et al, 2004, for a review). Although various OCD symptoms appear closely related to one another, hoarding does not appear particularly closely associated with OCD and is just as closely associated with depression as it is with OCD (Wu & Watson, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fourth and last stage, VOCI-MC and TAF-CS were added in the model. Addition of these two measures in the model caused a 2% of increase in the variance, and explained variance was increased to 58% (ΔF [2,238]=4.95, p<0.05). In the last stage, only VOCI-MC predicted significantly OCD symptoms (β=0.14, t=2.44, pr=0.16, p<0.05).…”
Section: Predictive Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second stage, TAF-Likelihood and TAF-Moral subscales which were among OCD beliefs were included in the model. These variables caused 21% and 30% of increases in the explained variance, respectively (ΔF [2,241]=37.01, p<0.001). When it was investigated which variable caused significant change, it was found that only TAF-Moral dimension significantly predicted OCD symptoms (β=0.46, t=4.12, pr=0.26, p<0.001).…”
Section: Predictive Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation