2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Obsessive compulsive font disorder’: the challenge of supporting pupils writing with the computer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is what Matthewman and Triggs (2004) described as 'obsessive compulsive font disorder'. The failure to address the deeper literacy learning objectives ultimately prevents this kind of activity from flourishing in these schools.…”
Section: School Provision and Support Of Ictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is what Matthewman and Triggs (2004) described as 'obsessive compulsive font disorder'. The failure to address the deeper literacy learning objectives ultimately prevents this kind of activity from flourishing in these schools.…”
Section: School Provision and Support Of Ictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noting, however, that one child focused on presentation at the first stage of composition, they imply that this child has approached the writing process inappropriately. This contrasts with Matthewman and Triggs (2004)'s analysis of on-screen writing: they also note the salience of visual aspects of writing (such as font size, colour and type) at the first stages of composition, but draw from interview data to suggest that some children find the selection of such presentational (or design) features as valuable in generating ideas.…”
Section: Digital Literacymentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Dourneen and S. Matthewman regardless of the level of subject expertise (Matthewman, 2008;Matthewman & Triggs, 2004). We argue that this tendency persists despite teachers reporting a high level of satisfaction about the congruence between the choice of technology and the subject content (John & Wheeler, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%