2015
DOI: 10.1002/arco.5064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obsidian distribution from a Lapita cemetery sheds light on its value to past societies

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BP (Petchey et al 2014;Petchey et al 2015). These dates, along with the presence terra australis 52 of West New Britain obsidian (Constantine et al 2015;Reepmeyer et al 2010), a range of extinct fauna (White et al 2010;Worthy et al 2015) and the diversity of pottery vessels and motifs indicate that it is a colonising site on Efate cf. Sheppard 1993).…”
Section: Archaeological Sites-efate Teoumamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…BP (Petchey et al 2014;Petchey et al 2015). These dates, along with the presence terra australis 52 of West New Britain obsidian (Constantine et al 2015;Reepmeyer et al 2010), a range of extinct fauna (White et al 2010;Worthy et al 2015) and the diversity of pottery vessels and motifs indicate that it is a colonising site on Efate cf. Sheppard 1993).…”
Section: Archaeological Sites-efate Teoumamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Would short use-life and focus on only one source imply obsidian as a luxury item for the accumulation of wealth? Variations in burial practices at the Teouma cemetery in Vanuatu possibly reflect different social positions of individuals (Valentin et al, 2011), but there is no evidence for the accumulation of obsidian by individuals (Constantine et al, 2015).…”
Section: Values Of Obsidianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant interpretation of the role of obsidian in Lapita societies currently is that it was transported for its social value connecting populations to a founding 'homeland' (Green, 1987: 246;Kirch, 1988: 113;. These interpretations have also been applied to artefact assemblages from Vanuatu (Reepmeyer et al, 2011;Galipaud et al, 2014;Constantine et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That suggestion has since proven incorrect (Tochilin et al 2012), but the material still came from west of the Solomons, specifically Muyuw-Woodlark Island in the Massim archipelago off the Papuan Tip. Combined with factors such as the presence of obsidian from Fergusson Island in the Massim in both the Reef Islands' Lapita site SE-RF-2 and at Teouma in Vanuatu to the south-east of the main Solomons (for the latter see Constantine et al 2015) and in the Post-Lapita Oposisi site on Yule Island on the edge the Papuan Gulf far to the west, the Woodlark finding led Sheppard and colleagues (2015:74-77) to hypothesise the existence of an east-west interaction sphere that also facilitated the appearance of Late Lapita on the Papuan coast and the presence of Late Lapita ceramics in Torres Strait. Sheppard et al do not mention the Lizard Island finds in this context, but Clark and Bedford (2008:70) recall in this same connection that Irwin (1992:143) predicted a generation ago that Lapita would be found in such locations (though not specifically Lizard), on the strength of a 100 per cent success rate of simulated one-way sailing voyages from the Solomons to northern Australia.…”
Section: Push and Pull Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%