[1991 Proceedings] the Twenty-Third Southeastern Symposium on System Theory
DOI: 10.1109/ssst.1991.138545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstacle avoidance using hierarchical dynamic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, Algorithm 21 terminates in a finite number of steps depending on ε and Z. Upon termination, it identifies the discrete spline trajectory that connects eachẑ ∈ A to the target τ in the fewest number of steps while minimizing the secondary objective function (2). Furthermore, Algorithm 22 used for motion replanning from a given start state σ ∈ W k σ , k σ ≥ 1, terminates in at most k max = (τ ) + 1 2 ( (σ ) − (τ )) ( (σ ) + (τ ) − 3) iterations after recomputing the optimal trajectory from σ to τ .…”
Section: Lemma 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, Algorithm 21 terminates in a finite number of steps depending on ε and Z. Upon termination, it identifies the discrete spline trajectory that connects eachẑ ∈ A to the target τ in the fewest number of steps while minimizing the secondary objective function (2). Furthermore, Algorithm 22 used for motion replanning from a given start state σ ∈ W k σ , k σ ≥ 1, terminates in at most k max = (τ ) + 1 2 ( (σ ) − (τ )) ( (σ ) + (τ ) − 3) iterations after recomputing the optimal trajectory from σ to τ .…”
Section: Lemma 19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization problem associated with most motion planning tasks is inherently non-convex 1 and difficult to solve. 2 The non-convexity of the problem is a direct consequence of the obstacle avoidance requirement and is further complicated by inclusion of the state and actuation constraints. Furthermore, changing and/or uncertain obstacle fields, which arise in most real-world applications, pose additional challenges in achieving the required solution to this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paths prefer coarse level cells which approximate the original data better. Somewhat closer to our strategy, [28] uses a filtering method to obtain coarse level information from the finer levels in the context of obstacle avoidance using dynamic programming.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents a discrete-time Time-Optimal motion planning algorithm based on the Dynamic Programming (DP) approach [10]. The existing works on the applications of DP to path planning can be found in [2], [11], [12], [13]. In particular, the approach pursued in [12] is the one most closely related to the present work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The optimization problem associated with most path planning tasks is inherently non-convex [1] and difficult to solve [2]. The non-convexity of the problem is a direct consequence of the obstacle avoidance requirement and is further complicated by the inclusion of the state and actuation constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%