2022
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2022.3161710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstacle Avoidance With Dynamic Avoidance Risk Region for Mobile Robots in Dynamic Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some recent studies considering dynamic obstacles. Guo [34] proposed an obstacle avoidance algorithm suitable for two-wheeled differential-driven robots by using a stereo vision system to detect dynamic obstacles, estimating the motion state of dynamic obstacles through an extended Kalman filter, and then by using the velocities of obstacles to calculate dynamic risk regions and realize dynamic obstacle avoidance for the robot.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some recent studies considering dynamic obstacles. Guo [34] proposed an obstacle avoidance algorithm suitable for two-wheeled differential-driven robots by using a stereo vision system to detect dynamic obstacles, estimating the motion state of dynamic obstacles through an extended Kalman filter, and then by using the velocities of obstacles to calculate dynamic risk regions and realize dynamic obstacle avoidance for the robot.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, although many researchers have improved upon the classical speed obstacle method, most studies have tended to choose a speed that is at the boundary between the collision and non-collision zones, as it is considered the most efficient solution that will ensure that there is no collision with the obstacle in the ideal situation [9][10][11]. However, in this case, when approaching an obstacle, the probability of collision between the AGV and the obstacle may be greatly increased due to the interference of uncertainties in the environment, possible sudden changes in the speed of the obstacle, possible errors in sensor measurements, and possible wheel slippage, among other factors [12,13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach guides robots to make dynamic responses by enhancing both global path planning methods (e.g., A * [13], Dijkstra [14]) and local path planning methods (such as the velocity obstacle method [15] and the dynamic window method [16]). For instance, Goller et al [17] combined the A * algorithm with a reactive local planning algorithm in densely populated supermarket environments to plan safe paths for robots. Nevertheless, when conflicts arise between human presence and the global path, robots may only opt for a waiting approach, which can adversely affect the comfort of individuals in the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%