2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstacle crossing deficits in older adults: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
112
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
112
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The close similarities in foot clearance and placement measures elicited by both spatial frequencies (see Galna et al 2009). Although the current lab-based study clearly demonstrates an increase in heel and toe clearance without detrimental effects to locomotion, further determination of how foot clearance changes over low-height obstacles such as the floor-section of door frames in realworld scenarios, where the thickness of the door frame may be greater or less than 1 cm, is required to fully determine the illusions efficacy as a means to reduce trip risk/improve safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The close similarities in foot clearance and placement measures elicited by both spatial frequencies (see Galna et al 2009). Although the current lab-based study clearly demonstrates an increase in heel and toe clearance without detrimental effects to locomotion, further determination of how foot clearance changes over low-height obstacles such as the floor-section of door frames in realworld scenarios, where the thickness of the door frame may be greater or less than 1 cm, is required to fully determine the illusions efficacy as a means to reduce trip risk/improve safety.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…These previous studies were summarized in Galna et al's [9] literature review, in which 16 articles were perused from an initial compilation of 727 articles. According to Galna et al, young and older adults infrequently come into contact with an obstacle, such as stumbling into or tripping over it, if adequate time is available to adapt foot placement in relation to the obstacle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, and in concord with our hypothesis, subjects with PD demonstrated a further decrease in obstacle crossing velocities (CVLead and CVCOM) when concurrently listening to music; spatial parameters of obstacle crossing were, however, preserved. Slower obstacle crossing velocities in nonparkinsonian older adults have been associated with a conservative crossing strategy, allowing subjects greater opportunity for recovery in the event of obstacle contact [16][17]. In the population with PD, however, it may be more appropriate to interpret reduced obstaclecrossing velocities as representing a detrimental obstaclecrossing behavior, as the decreased crossing speed may result in more time being spent in the unstable singlesupport phase of the gait cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%