1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01324515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstacles to and future goals of ten comprehensive community health promotion projects

Abstract: Over 100 project staff, community coalition members, and other representatives from 10 comprehensive community health promotion projects in the western United States were surveyed two years into a three year funding cycle about: (1) the problems or obstacles they judged as preventing successful completion of their current goals and objectives, and (2) future goals and objectives they envisioned for their projects. The key issues confronting respondents were diverse, although issues around the process of implem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These include presumptions about existing levels of staff or community capacity and inappropriate or insufficient support (1,33,42,97,119). For example, a community that is presumed to lack the capacity to implement a partnership may be denied funding (and access to technical support).…”
Section: Technical Assistance and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These include presumptions about existing levels of staff or community capacity and inappropriate or insufficient support (1,33,42,97,119). For example, a community that is presumed to lack the capacity to implement a partnership may be denied funding (and access to technical support).…”
Section: Technical Assistance and Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial excitement about a new community health initiative may generate ? a flurry of interest and participation, but support may diminish over time (1,87). Furthermore, in the absence of appropriate intermediate markers for more distant population-level health outcomes, those providing funding support may invest in (or divest from) a partnership regardless of progress.…”
Section: Making Outcomes Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The last question is very important, as funding agencies increasingly view their resources as seed money to support intervention while a community builds an infrastructure to continue such activities after the external funding ends (4,25,34,135). Similarly, there is a belief that communities that have been involved in addressing a public health problem will have both the wish and enhanced capacity to continue activities at some level (4,5,54,74,78,135,152).…”
Section: Durability Of Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community partners who perceive beneficial results from a project in which they have participated often wish to have the means for project durability (5,22,23,82). Unfortunately, many research organizations have simply removed themselves after the research phase of the project has ended, leaving the community partners without resources, capabilities, or other avenues to address the original problem.…”
Section: Durability Of Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%