1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1096-7494(99)80089-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstacles to the administrative modernization process in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This existing logic of justification was challenged when a “new” logic emerged from the NPM movement in Germany, as described below. Notably, contrary to other European countries (Klages and Löffler, 1996), public management reforms in Germany have to be understood in terms of a bottom-up movement that has been primarily driven by local “entrepreneurs”; typically, the state and federal authorities have been reluctant to institute such reforms (Kuhlmann et al , 2008). Early approaches to modernize the internal structures of federal organizations were undertaken in the 1970s by the establishment of a task force for government and administration reform .…”
Section: Research Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This existing logic of justification was challenged when a “new” logic emerged from the NPM movement in Germany, as described below. Notably, contrary to other European countries (Klages and Löffler, 1996), public management reforms in Germany have to be understood in terms of a bottom-up movement that has been primarily driven by local “entrepreneurs”; typically, the state and federal authorities have been reluctant to institute such reforms (Kuhlmann et al , 2008). Early approaches to modernize the internal structures of federal organizations were undertaken in the 1970s by the establishment of a task force for government and administration reform .…”
Section: Research Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These principles based on private sector experience and economic theories, and known as managerialism or New Public management (NPM) have come to dominate, for the last two decades, firstly the English speaking countries (Aucoin, 1996;Hood, 1991;Pollitt, 1990), followed by many other countries (Klages and Loffler, 1998;Mathiasen, 1999;Hope, 2001). Subsequently, the articulation of the Italian reforms has been conducted via the enactment of a number of sectorial laws, mainly concerned with the definition of new governance structures or more advanced systems of accounting and auditing (Azzone and Dente, 1999;Marcon and Panozzo, 1998).…”
Section: Context Of Study: Managerialism and Italian Public Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%