2013
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/1056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstetric Outcome of Pregnancies Following Abortions

Abstract: . Inclusion criteria were pregnancies with history of previous abortions. These cases were compared with a group of controls. RESULTS: There were 412 cases with previous history of abortions. There were 272 (66 %) booked cases while 140 (33.9%) were unbooked cases. 347 (84.2%) patients crossed viable period of pregnancy (more than 28 weeks). 56 (13.5%) patients had repeat abortions. Pregnancies complicated by high risk factors were 177(42.9%). 176(49.43%) patients underwent vaginal delivery and 138 (38.7%) und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Socioeconomically disadvantaged women experience more barriers when seeking abortion and they report struggling to arrange travel and secure adequate resources to cover procedural costs (Ostrach & Cheyney, 2014). For example, a lack of resources and an inability to afford abortion-related costs have been cited as reasons for delaying an abortion (Ostrach & Cheyney, 2014; Upadhyay, Koregol, Bulusu, Dubey, & Shah, 2013). Moreover, economically vulnerable patients who received financial assistance from an abortion fund were found to have a mere one fifth of the resources needed to pay for their abortions, which cost an average of over US$2,000 (Ely, Hales, Jackson, Maguin, & Hamilton, 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socioeconomically disadvantaged women experience more barriers when seeking abortion and they report struggling to arrange travel and secure adequate resources to cover procedural costs (Ostrach & Cheyney, 2014). For example, a lack of resources and an inability to afford abortion-related costs have been cited as reasons for delaying an abortion (Ostrach & Cheyney, 2014; Upadhyay, Koregol, Bulusu, Dubey, & Shah, 2013). Moreover, economically vulnerable patients who received financial assistance from an abortion fund were found to have a mere one fifth of the resources needed to pay for their abortions, which cost an average of over US$2,000 (Ely, Hales, Jackson, Maguin, & Hamilton, 2017a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%